June 18, 2010
1:20 p.m.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Suresh V. <suresh_vv@yahoo.com> wrote:
Why does buildout use the "<=" syntax for this? Wouldn't it be nicer to just overload "extends"?
Someone might already have been using this name. In fact, I knew of some recipes that did. I chose that syntax because it conveyed flow of information from the named section, as in: [bar] <= foo which can be read as "bar gets data from foo". <shrug> Jim -- Jim Fulton