Sept. 16, 2013
8:07 a.m.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> wrote:
So there've been a number of updates to PEP453, so i'm posting it here again for more discussion:
Just want to say that It is good to see that over three year `pip` has gained strength to be the tool of choice for Python package management. My attempt to propose this three years ago had failed, because there was no package management tool people could agree to, even though the proposal was for the interactive user script that could recommend all : https://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2010-March/015894.html So, why PIP? -- anatoly t.