Oct. 22, 2015
3:46 p.m.
Am 21.10.2015 um 19:04 schrieb Ronny Pfannschmidt:
another example is that without a standard there is no viable way to replace a grown messy legacy tool with a much less messy tool over time creating a new trimmed down standard and supporting it from the legacy tool as well as from the new tool works out much better than trying to trim down the legacy tool over time
I prefer the code of unittests to the not testable sentences in a standard. But maybe I am missing something. Regards, Thomas Güttler -- http://www.thomas-guettler.de/