Re: [Distutils] [Catalog-sig] Merge catalog-sig and distutils-sig
On 29 March 2013 14:45, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
If we leave the main list the 'distutils-sig', and just announce that 'catalog-sig' is retired, folks who want to follow the new list just switch over. All the archives (mailman / gmane / etc.) stay valid, but the list goes into moderated mode.
Whoever has the power to do this, do it please. Richard
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Richard Jones <richard@python.org> wrote:
On 29 March 2013 14:45, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
If we leave the main list the 'distutils-sig', and just announce that 'catalog-sig' is retired, folks who want to follow the new list just switch over. All the archives (mailman / gmane / etc.) stay valid, but the list goes into moderated mode.
Whoever has the power to do this, do it please.
+1 distutils-sig it is. We're expanding the charter to "the distutils standard library module, the Python Package Index and associated interoperabilty standards", but that's a lot easier than forcing everyone to rewrite their mail filters. Besides, it's gonna be a *long* time before the default build system in the standard library is anything other than distutils. Coupling the build system to the language release cycle has proven to be a *bad idea*, because the addition of new platform support needs to happen in a more timely fashion than language releases. The incorporation of pip bootstrapping into 3.4 will also make it a lot easier to recommend more readily upgraded alternatives. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Richard Jones <richard@python.org> wrote:
On 29 March 2013 14:45, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
If we leave the main list the 'distutils-sig', and just announce that 'catalog-sig' is retired, folks who want to follow the new list just switch over. All the archives (mailman / gmane / etc.) stay valid, but the list goes into moderated mode.
Whoever has the power to do this, do it please.
+1
distutils-sig it is. We're expanding the charter to "the distutils standard library module, the Python Package Index and associated interoperabilty standards", but that's a lot easier than forcing everyone to rewrite their mail filters.
Besides, it's gonna be a *long* time before the default build system in the standard library is anything other than distutils. Coupling the build system to the language release cycle has proven to be a *bad idea*, because the addition of new platform support needs to happen in a more timely fashion than language releases. The incorporation of pip bootstrapping into 3.4 will also make it a lot easier to recommend more readily upgraded alternatives.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
Sounds good to me, whoever please to doing the needful. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
I've set the wheels in motion. I just need a little help from the pydotorg volunteers (and some hits from the mailman cluebat). Richard On 30 March 2013 06:43, Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> wrote:
On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Richard Jones <richard@python.org> wrote:
On 29 March 2013 14:45, Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> wrote:
If we leave the main list the 'distutils-sig', and just announce that 'catalog-sig' is retired, folks who want to follow the new list just switch over. All the archives (mailman / gmane / etc.) stay valid, but the list goes into moderated mode.
Whoever has the power to do this, do it please.
+1
distutils-sig it is. We're expanding the charter to "the distutils standard library module, the Python Package Index and associated interoperabilty standards", but that's a lot easier than forcing everyone to rewrite their mail filters.
Besides, it's gonna be a *long* time before the default build system in the standard library is anything other than distutils. Coupling the build system to the language release cycle has proven to be a *bad idea*, because the addition of new platform support needs to happen in a more timely fashion than language releases. The incorporation of pip bootstrapping into 3.4 will also make it a lot easier to recommend more readily upgraded alternatives.
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
Sounds good to me, whoever please to doing the needful.
----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
participants (3)
-
Donald Stufft -
Nick Coghlan -
Richard Jones