Re: [Distutils] PEP 345 update + RFC on "Requires-External" and "Requires-Python"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Tres Seaver tseaver@palladion.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
That's why I said that 100% of the information could stay in PKG-INFO (==the metadata), instead of having to maintain something else at PyPI.
Apoligies for misunderstanding: I thought you were arguing to remove the field from PKG-INFO. I'm fine with removing any mandate for a registry from the PEP.
That's fine, probably related to my frenglish too.
There's one thing though: do we want the url and description data with the name ?
I would say we don't need anything. This field is like the "data type" stuff (not yet in a PEP): we want the downstream folks from Fedora / Debian to suggest values to the upstream (PyPI) package maintainer. I think we can get "enough" traction from just having a well-understood name ('zlib', 'libxslt', etc.) in this field.
Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
participants (1)
-
Tres Seaver