FYI, PEP 345 and 386 are now accepted.
Thanks to all the people that helped in building them !
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Guido van Rossum email@example.com Date: Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:29 AM Subject: Re: PEP 345 and PEP 386 To: Tarek Ziadé firstname.lastname@example.org Cc: Python-Dev email@example.com
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Tarek Ziadé firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Guido van Rossum email@example.com wrote: [..]
I have one comment on PEP 345: Why is author-email mandatory? I'm sure there are plenty of cases where either the author doesn't want their email address published, or their last know email address is no longer valid. (Tarek responded off-line that it isn't all that mandatory; I propose to say so in the PEP.)
Yes, I propose to remove the mandatory flag from that field.
Since this is done I now approve both PEP 345 and PEP 386 (which is not to say that small editorial changes to the text couldn't be made).
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)