Hello, Having problems here installing http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/r/reportlab/reportlab-2.5.win-amd64-py2.... . Neither setuptools 0.6c11 nor distribute 0.6.14 gets it right. We don't have and don't want to have a compiler on the server, so we need rely on binary packages. - setuptools just fails miserably even with easy_install: http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZD - distribute installs it (tho in a ...-win32.egg folder): http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZE - zc.buildout cannot install it with distribute, because it wants to use the source tarball (and we don't have a compiler) or when I make it not to be able to see the tarball, it does not find the reportlab-2.5.win-amd64-py2.6.exe. I guess it does not get the platform right. Any hints? -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER -- Quote of the day: Age before beauty and pearls before swine. -- Dorothy Parker
At 03:40 PM 3/14/2011 +0100, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
Having problems here installing http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/r/reportlab/reportlab-2.5.win-amd64-py2.... . Neither setuptools 0.6c11 nor distribute 0.6.14 gets it right.
We don't have and don't want to have a compiler on the server, so we need rely on binary packages.
- setuptools just fails miserably even with easy_install: http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZD - distribute installs it (tho in a ...-win32.egg folder): http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZE - zc.buildout cannot install it with distribute, because it wants to use the source tarball (and we don't have a compiler) or when I make it not to be able to see the tarball, it does not find the reportlab-2.5.win-amd64-py2.6.exe. I guess it does not get the platform right.
Any hints?
Run "python -c 'import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform()'" (with the Python interpreter you're using. (By the way, I think from the log you gave, that reportlab may in fact be installed and usable on your machine, despite the attempt to download it a second time and build it from source. But I could be wrong.)
On 03/14/2011 07:50 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
At 03:40 PM 3/14/2011 +0100, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
Having problems here installing http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/r/reportlab/reportlab-2.5.win-amd64-py2.... . Neither setuptools 0.6c11 nor distribute 0.6.14 gets it right.
We don't have and don't want to have a compiler on the server, so we need rely on binary packages.
- setuptools just fails miserably even with easy_install: http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZD - distribute installs it (tho in a ...-win32.egg folder): http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZE - zc.buildout cannot install it with distribute, because it wants to use the source tarball (and we don't have a compiler) or when I make it not to be able to see the tarball, it does not find the reportlab-2.5.win-amd64-py2.6.exe. I guess it does not get the platform right.
Any hints?
Run "python -c 'import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform()'" (with the Python interpreter you're using.
D:\install>c:\Python26_64\python.exe Python 2.6.6 (r266:84297, Aug 24 2010, 18:13:38) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform() win-amd64
(By the way, I think from the log you gave, that reportlab may in fact be installed and usable on your machine, despite the attempt to download it a second time and build it from source. But I could be wrong.)
Might be, but zc.buildout errs out if it detects an error by the underlying installer. And I *want* to have reportlab installed by zc.buildout. -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER -- Quote of the day: Nothing is so good as it seems beforehand. - George Eliot
Out of curiosity, how does pip handle this? On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:28, Adam GROSZER <agroszer@gmail.com> wrote:
On 03/14/2011 07:50 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
At 03:40 PM 3/14/2011 +0100, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
Having problems here installing
http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/r/reportlab/reportlab-2.5.win-amd64-py2.... . Neither setuptools 0.6c11 nor distribute 0.6.14 gets it right.
We don't have and don't want to have a compiler on the server, so we need rely on binary packages.
- setuptools just fails miserably even with easy_install: http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZD - distribute installs it (tho in a ...-win32.egg folder): http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZE - zc.buildout cannot install it with distribute, because it wants to use the source tarball (and we don't have a compiler) or when I make it not to be able to see the tarball, it does not find the reportlab-2.5.win-amd64-py2.6.exe. I guess it does not get the platform right.
Any hints?
Run "python -c 'import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform()'" (with the Python interpreter you're using.
D:\install>c:\Python26_64\python.exe Python 2.6.6 (r266:84297, Aug 24 2010, 18:13:38) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform() win-amd64
(By the way, I think from the log you gave, that reportlab may in fact be installed and usable on your machine, despite the attempt to download it a second time and build it from source. But I could be wrong.)
Might be, but zc.buildout errs out if it detects an error by the underlying installer. And I *want* to have reportlab installed by zc.buildout. -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER -- Quote of the day: Nothing is so good as it seems beforehand. - George Eliot _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
On 03/16/2011 12:09 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Out of curiosity, how does pip handle this?
Not much better. http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZE/2 and "pip install reportlab==2.5" fails with the usual "no vcvarsall" found -- no C compiler.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:28, Adam GROSZER<agroszer@gmail.com> wrote:
On 03/14/2011 07:50 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
At 03:40 PM 3/14/2011 +0100, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
Having problems here installing
http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/r/reportlab/reportlab-2.5.win-amd64-py2.... . Neither setuptools 0.6c11 nor distribute 0.6.14 gets it right.
We don't have and don't want to have a compiler on the server, so we need rely on binary packages.
- setuptools just fails miserably even with easy_install: http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZD - distribute installs it (tho in a ...-win32.egg folder): http://paste.lisp.org/+2KZE - zc.buildout cannot install it with distribute, because it wants to use the source tarball (and we don't have a compiler) or when I make it not to be able to see the tarball, it does not find the reportlab-2.5.win-amd64-py2.6.exe. I guess it does not get the platform right.
Any hints?
Run "python -c 'import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform()'" (with the Python interpreter you're using.
D:\install>c:\Python26_64\python.exe Python 2.6.6 (r266:84297, Aug 24 2010, 18:13:38) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform() win-amd64
(By the way, I think from the log you gave, that reportlab may in fact be installed and usable on your machine, despite the attempt to download it a second time and build it from source. But I could be wrong.)
Might be, but zc.buildout errs out if it detects an error by the underlying installer. And I *want* to have reportlab installed by zc.buildout. -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER -- Quote of the day: Nothing is so good as it seems beforehand. - George Eliot _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2011 08:38 AM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
On 03/16/2011 12:09 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Out of curiosity, how does pip handle this?
Not much better.
and "pip install reportlab==2.5" fails with the usual "no vcvarsall" found -- no C compiler.
FWIW, the "we don't want to install a compiler" requirement means pip is not a viable option. At this point it doesn't know how to install any variety of binary distribution, only sdists. (At the very least, the capability to install bdist_msi is on the roadmap.) Carl -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2A4nkACgkQFRcxmeyPUXLMSwCdHAJ5TAlIAcXsX21be29xI4RR DnYAn21IJCoHOeL0cYGIaG/hTu0t6YI8 =G5+H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
At 11:28 AM 3/16/2011 +0100, Adam GROSZER wrote:
On 03/14/2011 07:50 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
Run "python -c 'import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform()'" (with the Python interpreter you're using.
D:\install>c:\Python26_64\python.exe Python 2.6.6 (r266:84297, Aug 24 2010, 18:13:38) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform() win-amd64
Hm. What's sys.platform? Is it win32? I suspect the problem has to do with all the win32-specificness scattered through setuptools; I think I know what I need to do to fix it all, but it'll be a fairly substantial patch; can you help with the testing if I email you such a patch?
On 03/16/2011 11:47 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
At 11:28 AM 3/16/2011 +0100, Adam GROSZER wrote:
On 03/14/2011 07:50 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
Run "python -c 'import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform()'" (with the Python interpreter you're using.
D:\install>c:\Python26_64\python.exe Python 2.6.6 (r266:84297, Aug 24 2010, 18:13:38) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform() win-amd64
Hm. What's sys.platform? Is it win32?
Exactly.
I suspect the problem has to do with all the win32-specificness scattered through setuptools; I think I know what I need to do to fix it all, but it'll be a fairly substantial patch; can you help with the testing if I email you such a patch?
Sure thing. -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER -- Quote of the day: Don't knock President Fillmore. He kept us out of Vietnam.
Hello, On 03/16/2011 11:47 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
At 11:28 AM 3/16/2011 +0100, Adam GROSZER wrote:
On 03/14/2011 07:50 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
Run "python -c 'import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform()'" (with the Python interpreter you're using.
D:\install>c:\Python26_64\python.exe Python 2.6.6 (r266:84297, Aug 24 2010, 18:13:38) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import pkg_resources;print pkg_resources.get_build_platform() win-amd64
Hm. What's sys.platform? Is it win32?
I suspect the problem has to do with all the win32-specificness scattered through setuptools; I think I know what I need to do to fix it all, but it'll be a fairly substantial patch; can you help with the testing if I email you such a patch?
Here is a changeset for distribute that should give some idea what seems to make it work https://bitbucket.org/agroszer/distribute-0.6/changeset/1d3923b865a6 -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER -- Quote of the day: Beware of a dark-haired man with a loud tie.
participants (5)
-
Adam GROSZER -
Adam GROSZER -
Carl Meyer -
Lennart Regebro -
P.J. Eby