Mailman 3 June 2002 - Doc-SIG

Docbook output
by Dethe Elza June 17, 2002

June 17, 2002

Hi folks, Has any work been done to create DocBook output from reST input? If not, where would I begin if I wanted to tackle such a thing? I'm actually interested in three output formats (in addition to XHTML and PDF, which appear to be well in hand): * DocBook * Simplified DocBook * XMLspec (the format W3C docs are written in) If there's anyone working on this already, how can I help? Please cc any reply, as I'm not (yet?) a subscriber to the list. TIA -Dethe

5 6

Re: [Doc-SIG] docutils feedback
by David Goodger June 16, 2002

June 16, 2002

Simon, could you list Doc-SIG explicitly in the To: or Cc: field of your messages please? Tony's reply to your message didn't make it to the Doc-SIG, probably because he assumed that replying *to* a message which arrived *from* a mailing list would make it *back* to the mailing list. It should, but it didn't because of the non-standard headers in your message. I've quoted Tony's entire reply below for the benefit of the rest of Doc-SIG. [David] >> You have to realize, this is a volunteer open source project. [Simon] > No worries. I'm aware of that. You asked for feedback, though ;) Sure, and it's appreciated. The tone of your message was just a bit... demanding, that's all. I'll add your explanation of an "example" directive to the `to-do list`__. __ http://docutils.sf.net/spec/notes.html#body-example [Simon, re literal blocks and why he doesn't want them indented] > My use case is to write technical documentation, say a SQL cheat > sheet. So I want show code and to explain it. Now, to be sure, I > want to try out the code which is show. This is way I need > copy/paste: I test in on some shell, copy it over to the doc (the > rst file in that case), perhaps beautify/comment it, copy it back to > the shell for testing and so forth. This is where the identation is > in the way, and here docs would be handy. So your motivation is convenience. You want to avoid having to indent the interactive sessions you copy and paste into the docs in order to avoid having to unindent when you re-copy and paste the edited code for test purposes. Does that sum it up? I'm not going to change the syntax for literal blocks; indentation does a fine job IMO. Removing indentation as the delimiter would require block-end delimiters (there is already a block-start delimiter: "::"), which I am loathe to do. A directive like the "here-literal" example I showed seems like the best you'll get (although it's not very good!). But read on; perhaps the idea below will work for your SQL examples? [Tony's reply] > Hmm. There have been previous ideas on how to do this sort of thing. I think that "indented literal blocks" and "examples" are separate issues. In an "example", you'll still need syntax for the code or interactive session, to distinguish it from the explanatory text. > Minor digression > ---------------- > First off, we already have a "special case" for Python examples - the > support provided for blocks of Python code - for instance:: > > The following is targeted at doctest: > > >>> a = 1 > >>> a > 1 > > and can thus be used to test code... The point being, this syntax does *not* require indentation. The leading ">>> " prompt is sufficient to recognize the construct, and a blank line terminates the block. > (pysource, for instance, has a --doctest switch which allows it to > read a text file in and just pass it to doctest - intended for use > in writing some sorts of documentation/test script). Obviously this > special case is there for incestuous reasons - which is why this is > a minor digression. But... This gives me an idea. Perhaps we could generalize the "doctest block" construct (which is overly Python-centric) to other interactive sessions. "Doctest block" could be renamed to "I/O block" or "interactive block", and each of these could also be recognized as such by the parser: - Shell sessions:: $ cat example1.txt A block beginning with a "$ " prompt is interpreted as a shell session interactive block. As with Doctest blocks, the interactive block ends with the first blank line, and wouldn't have to be indented. - Root shell sessions:: # cat example2.txt A block beginning with a "# " prompt is interpreted as a root shell session (the user is or has to be logged in as root) interactive block. Again, the block ends with a blank line. Other standard (and unambiguous) interactive session prompts could easily be added. > Main point > ---------- > ...it's then not hard to envisage a directive that goes something like:: > > .. sqlcheat:: > explanation: > This is *not* real SQL! > sql: > FOR fred IN tables DO something; > > (apologies for what is doubtless poor directive layout design - > David is better at this sort of thing than I) which might: > > a. write out the explanation neatly > b. write out the SQL code neatly > c. *run* the SQL code and present the result > > (something similar was discussed at one point as a possible way of > allowing the reST quick reference to be written in reST - at the > moment it's hand-written in HTML). > > This approach has the major advantage of saving you all of that > manual cut-and-paste. It also means that if at some stage you want > to expand the examples to contrast what two different SQL > implementations do with the SQL code, you don't need to change the > text by much - just alter the explanation occasionally to reflect > that two sets of output are being produced. Instead, it's the > directive code that gets changed. So the advantage is that the running of the test code (embedded in the docs) is automated. All that's needed now is a clear set of requirements, a good design, and running code. ;-) -- David Goodger <goodger(a)users.sourceforge.net> Open-source projects: - Python Docutils: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/ (includes reStructuredText: http://docutils.sf.net/rst.html) - The Go Tools Project: http://gotools.sourceforge.net/

5 5

docutils feedback
by Simon Hefti June 14, 2002

June 14, 2002

Hi David, We discussed a couple of rst syntax fragments a couple of month ago. Now I actually started using docutils, and I like it. Here are a few questions and comments (I'm using docutils-0.1). - one problem resulted in this error message: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/hefti/local_in_archive/src/docutils-0.1/tools/html.py", line 26, in ? reporter=reporter) File "/usr/local/Python-2.2b1/lib/python2.2/site-packages/docutils/core.py", line 85, in publish pub.publish(source, destination) File "/usr/local/Python-2.2b1/lib/python2.2/site-packages/docutils/core.py", line 67, in publish self.writer.write(document, destination) File "/usr/local/Python-2.2b1/lib/python2.2/site-packages/docutils/writers/__init__.py", line 56, in write self.record() File "/usr/local/Python-2.2b1/lib/python2.2/site-packages/docutils/writers/html4css1.py", line 36, in record self.recordfile(self.output, self.destination) File "/usr/local/Python-2.2b1/lib/python2.2/site-packages/docutils/writers/__init__.py", line 86, in recordfile output = output.encode('raw-unicode-escape') # @@@ temporary UnicodeError: ASCII decoding error: ordinal not in range(128) ... where I wished to see the line number of the rst document more than the stack trace. In some error cases, the line number is shown, though. - just realized that the --version option is mssing: python html.py --version should, in my opinion, write some version info to stdout. - cannot handle umlauts ! I can see that you do not want to deal with exotic characters. I would expect docutils to be able to process a few standard character sets, though, including iso-8859-1. I'm a Tcl guy, where the programming language itself supports all kinds of encodings. I assume python can do this as well. - I'm not sure I like the table markup. I think that it is very usefull and complete, but perhaps sometimes a simpler variant could be helpful, e.g. like ---+----- id | desc ---+----- 1 | foo 2 | a rather long line which is not matched by the others ---+----- One problem I had was with a "...." in the table, which was interpreted as a title rather. I was confused because I was not thinking of writing titles within tables. Another problem of the table syntax is that monospaced chars are often not approriate to write complex tables (this is one reason why spread sheets are successfull), and long text in cells tends to blow the ASCII art up so much that it is not readable, or editable easily. - how to mark-up examples ? .. example:: would be nice - literal blocks: require no identation, please ! (but end-of-block) This was one of the main reasons for POD: start a document, copy-paste code or whatever, and process it into man pages, html and so forth. I would consider somthing like: previous para::my_end_tag select foo from bar where id=1; .. my_end_tag at least as a variant. - relative URLs ? I would like to add relative URLs, e.g.: see also /some/where/more.html Is there a mark-up for that ? Could docutils provide one ? Thanks a lot, Simon. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simon Hefti simon.hefti(a)netcetera.ch Netcetera AG, 8040 Zuerich phone +41 1 247 79 47 fax +41 1 247 70 75

3 5

WE NEED YOUR HELP
by communityservices＠racingknowledge.com June 5, 2002

June 5, 2002

Hello, Thank you for taking the time for reading this e-mail, my name is Michael Armstrong. I am founding member of Racing Knowledge (dot) Org [http://www.racingknowledge.org]. As some of you may now our former web site, although filled with information, was rather archaic. over the past three months the other founding members and myself have been working with a local development company to produce a new web site, this new web site will provide the following services for our members: Online Auctions Online Forums Racing News Racing Articles How To's Newsletters Track Locator Shop Locator Web Search (Specific to automotive needs) Post You Ride / Rate Your Ride We will also provide a place for shops, clubs and users to post a single page in our web directory of whatever they want (within reason). Racing Knowledge has always been and always will remain a free service. We do not and never intend to make any profit here, the only thing we ask is that our users click on our sponsors banners if they find a banner that interests them. HERE IS WHY WE NEED YOUR HELP Our former content was lost when our contract with our host expired this leaves us in a very sad position. What I ask of you is to help us get back to good with our new site that will be online within the next month or so, and even with the generic forum software in place of the old site now [http://www.racingknowledge.org], go there sign up post a question, get an answer. Browse our online store (we make no profit here, we make a commission of the sales and that helps pay the bills, this new site is costing us near 30,000 dollars that we are going to have to pay back over the next 3 months). Racing Knowledge T-shirts and Accessories: http://www.cafepress.com/cp/store/store.aspx?storeid=rko Racing Knowledge Store: http://racingknowledge.vstoreauto.com/ I am also looking for ad sponsors, forum moderators, and content. If you would like to write an article and have it posted on our site with your name and perhaps a banner of your choice to your web site, or anywhere you wish, please send it to content(a)racingknowledge.org Thank You For Your Time Michael Armstrong Founding Member Racing Knowledge marmstrong(a)racingknowledge.org http://www.racingknowledge.org

1 0

ASCII to Word?
by Aahz June 4, 2002

June 4, 2002

All right, I'm ready to get started on writing my book. My publisher wants the document in Word format. I'm starting in some form of ASCII, quite likely reST. What do people recommend as the best path for getting from here to there? Is anyone else using reST for long technical documents? In the absence of better advice, I'm going to convert to OpenOffice's XML format, then use OpenOffice to convert to Word. One way or another, I'm assuming that Python will be used for at least the first stage of translation. -- Aahz (aahz(a)pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "In the end, outside of spy agencies, people are far too trusting and willing to help." --Ira Winkler

4 5

Entschuldigen Sie bitte die St�rung!
by phoengeist38259＠arcor.de June 3, 2002

June 3, 2002

Entschuldigen Sie bitte die Störung! Mir ist etwas zu Ohren gekommen. Eine relativ aussergewöhnliche Gerüchteküche, aus der man mir ein schwerverdauliches Süppchen vorgesetzt hat, ist der Grund meiner Mail. Unappetitlich ist gar kein Ausdruck! Ist es möglich auf funktechnischem Wege(in welchen Frequenzbereichen?) jemanden zu beeinflussen oder zu manipulieren? Oder sogar zu schikanieren und terrorisieren? Unter dem Motto:"Einen am Sender?Nich ganz alleine? Kleine Mannim Ohr?Falsche Wellenlänge?Bohnen in den Ohren? Auf den Zahn gefühlt(Amalgam)?Mal unverbindlich reinhören? Der Pullacher Wanzentanz? Ist das Spinnerei?Das geht doch gar nicht,oder? Und wenn wie sieht das ethisch moralisch aus? Zur technischen Seite der Sache gibt es zwar Berichte und Webseiten: Totalitaer,de - Die Waffe gegen die Kritik http://www.raum-und-zeit.com/Aktuell/Brummton.htm http://www.fosar-bludorf.com/Tempelhof/ http://jya.com/haarp.htm http://www.zeitenschrift.at/magazin/zs_24_15/1_mikrowaffen.htm http://www.bse-plus.de/d/doc/lbrief/lbmincontr.htm http://home.nexgo.de/kraven/bigb/big3.html http://w3.nrl.navy.mil/projects/haarp/index.html http://cryptome.org/ http://www.raven1.net/ravindex.htm http://www.calweb.com/~welsh/ http://www.cahe.org/ http://www.parascope.com/ds/mkultra0.htm http://www.trufax.org/menu/mind.html http://www.trufax.org/menu/elect.html http://mindcontrolforum.com/ http://www.trufax.org/menu/elect.html usw. usw. usw. ,aber,das kann doch nicht sein,das soetwas gemacht wird,oder? Eine Menschenrechtsverletzung sonder gleichen!?! Ist es möglich,durch Präparation,der Ohren und im Zusammenspiel mit eventuell vorhandenem Zahnersatz? Mit relativ einfacher Funktechnik?? In diesem Land?Hier und heute??? Unter welchen Motiven? Wo ist eigentlich die Abteilung 5 des BND und des Verfassungsschutzes? Kann es sein,daß es Leute gibt,die dem BND/Verfassungsschutz,auf funktechnischem Wege permanent einen Situationsbericht abliefern,ohne es selbst zu merken,im Kindesalter machbar gemacht?? Werden durch solche inoffiziellen Mitarbeiter,beim BND und Verfassungsschutz,nach Stasimanier, Informationen von und über,rein theoretisch, jeden Bundesbürger,gesammelt? Gibt es dann noch ein Recht auf Privatsphere? Wer kontrolliert eigentlich den BND,MAD und Verfassungsschutz auf Unterwanderung??? In der Mail geht es mir eigentlich um die Frage,ob es kriminellen Elementen, aus dem Motiv der Bereicherung,oder Gruppierungen aus ideologischen Motiven, möglich ist ,sich Wissen und Technik anzueignen,die zu anderen Zeiten, aus anderen Motiven(Westfernsehen?),entwickelt wurde. Und stellt der technische Wissensstand, der der Allgemeinheit bekannt ist wirklich das Ende der Fahnenstange dar? Ist es denn nicht kriminellen Elementen genauso möglich, ich sage das jetzt mal verharmlost und verniedlichend, einzelne Personen oder Gruppen mit relativ einfachen Mitteln, aus welchen Motiven auch immer, auszuspionieren? Und stellt diese "Ausspioniererei" nicht einen erheblichen Eingriff in die Privatsphäre dar? Ist es möglich einzelne Personen oder Gruppen, eine Akzeptans einer gewissen Öffentlichkeit(suggeriert?), die z.B. mit Hilfe von Internetseiten,wie zum Beispiel dem "Pranger"geschaffen werden könnte, mal vorausgestzt,zu terroriesieren und oder zu schikanieren, und das in aller (suggerierten)Öffentlichkeit?Haben die Leute die da am Pranger, oder auf irgendeiner anderen Seite verunglimpft,oder gar Verleumdet werden, eigentlich eine Chance zur Gegenöffentlichkeit?Ist das nicht Rufmord? Vor einigen Jahren bin ich per Zufall auf die Seite "Der Pranger" gestoßen, damals lief das noch nicht unter dem Deckmantel der Partnervermittlung. Können sich einzelne Personen,oder Interessengemeinschaften, aus reinem Selbstzweck,solcher Seiten bedienen, um unter dem Deckmantel einer fragwürdigen Zivilkourage, durch anzetteln irgendwelcher Hetzkampagnen,eigene, ganz persöhnliche Interessen durchsetzen? Können solche Seiten zur Koordination von kriminellen machenschaften dienen? Die Frage,ist es Möglichkeit oder Unmöglichkeit,technisch und gesellschaftlich, einzelne Personen,oder auch Gruppierungen,aus einer kriminellen/ideologischen Energei heraus,zu manipulieren oder zu beeinflussen,terrorisieren oder zu schickanieren,und zwar gezielt. Zielgruppenmanipulation durch Massenmedien sind alltägliche Manipulation, der mansich,mehr oder weniger,entziehen kann. Wird das Recht auf Privatsphäre,schleichend,tiefenpsychologisch, durch Sendungen,wie,zum Beispiel "Big brother",untergraben? Sollte bei einem der Angemailten ein gewisser Wissensstand zum Thema vorhanden sein, wäre ich über Hinweise zum Thema froh. Auf der Suche nach Antworten auf meine Fragen maile ich verschiedene Adressen aus dem Internet an, und hoffe aufkonstruktive Antworten und Kritiken. Über einen Besuch auf der Seite <http://hometown.aol.de/reinerhohn38259/homepage/index.html> würde ich mich freuen. Sollten Sie von mir mehrfach angeschrieben worden sein,so bitte ich Sie,mir dies zu entschuldigen, das war nicht beabsichtigt. Der Grund für meine Anonymität ist die Tatsache, daß bei derlei Fragenstellerei, verständlicherweise,schnell der Ruf nach der Psychatrie laut wird. Was auch Methode hat(ist). Sollten Sie die Mail als Belästigung empfinden, möchte ich mich hiermit dafür entschuldigen! Big brother is watching you? Excuse please the disturbance! Me something came to ears. A relatively unusual rumor kitchen, from which one put forward to me a heavydigestible soup, is the reason of my Mail. Unappetizing is no printout! Is it possible on radio Wege(in for which frequency ranges?) to influence or manipulate someone? Terrorize or to even chicane and? Under the Motto:"Einen at the Sender?Nich quite alone? Small Mannim Ohr?Fal Wellenlaenge?Bohnen in the ears? On the tooth clean-hear gefuehlt(Amalgam)?Mal witthout obligation? The Pullacher bug wanzentanz? Isn't the Spinnerei?Das goes nevertheless at all, or? And if as looks ethicalally morally? For the technical page of the thing there is to report and web page: Totalitaer,de - Die Waffe gegen die Kritik http://www.raum-und-zeit.com/Aktuell/Brummton.htm http://www.fosar-bludorf.com/Tempelhof/ http://jya.com/haarp.htm http://www.zeitenschrift.at/magazin/zs_24_15/1_mikrowaffen.htm http://www.bse-plus.de/d/doc/lbrief/lbmincontr.htm http://home.nexgo.de/kraven/bigb/big3.html http://w3.nrl.navy.mil/projects/haarp/index.html http://cryptome.org/ http://www.raven1.net/ravindex.htm http://www.calweb.com/~welsh/ http://www.cahe.org/ http://www.parascope.com/ds/mkultra0.htm http://www.trufax.org/menu/mind.html http://www.trufax.org/menu/elect.html http://mindcontrolforum.com/ http://www.trufax.org/menu/elect.html usw. usw. usw. but, that cannot be nevertheless, which is made soetwas, or? A violation of human rights resemble special!?! Is it possible, by preparation, the ears and in interaction with possibly available artificial dentures? With relatively simple radio engineering?? In this Land?Hier and today??? Under which motives? Where is the department actually 5 of the BND and the protection of the constitution? Can it be that there are people, which deliver the Federal Intelligence Service/protection of the constitution, on radio way permanently a situation report, without noticing it, in the infancy feasiblly made? By such unofficial coworkers, with the BND and protection of the constitution, after Stasimanier, is information collected of and over,purely theoretically, each Federal citizen? Is there then still another right to Privatsphere? Who actually checks the BND, WAD and protection of the constitution for infiltration??? Into the Mail actually concerns it to me the question whether it criminal items, from which motive of enriching, or groupings from ideological motives is possible, to acquire itself knowledge and technique which were developed at other times, from other Motiven(Westfernsehen?).And does the technical knowledge status place, to that the public admits is really the end of the flag bar? Is it not to criminal items just as possible, I legend that now times played down and does nice-end, individual persons or groups with relatively simple means, to spy from whatever motives always? And doesn't this " Ausspioniererei " represent a substantial intervention into the privatsphaere? It is possible individual persons or groups, one acceptance to of a certain Oeffentlichkeit(suggeriert?), e.g. by Internet pages, how for example the " Pranger"geschaffen could become, times vorausgestzt, to terroriesieren and or chicane, and in everything (the people suggerierten)Oeffentlichkeit?Haben there at the Pranger, or on any other page to be reviled, or slandered, actually a chance to the Gegenoeffentlichkeit?Ist that not character assassination? Some years ago I am by coincidence the page " the Pranger " encountered, at that time ran not yet under the cover of the partner switching.Itself can individual persons, or communities of interests, from pure self purpose, such pages to serve, over under the cover of a doubtful Zivilkourage, through plot any rushing campaigns, own, quite persoehnliche interests to intersperse? Can such pages serve for the co-ordination of criminal machinations? The question, is it possibility or impossibility, technically and socially, individual persons, or also groupings of manipulating or of influencing from an criminal/ideological Energei, terrorizes or to schickanieren, directed.Target group manipulation by mass media are everyday manipulation, from which, more or less, can extract itself. Does the right to privatsphaere, creeping, by transmissions become deep psychological, how, for example " Big undermine brother"? If the Angemailten should be available a certain knowledge status to the topic with one, I would be glad over notes to the topic On the search for responses to my questions maile I different addresses from the Internet on, and hope up-constructional responses and criticisms.Over an attendance on the page <http://hometown.aol.de/reinerhohn38259/homepage/index.html> wuerde I are pleased.If you should have been written down by me several times, then please I you to excuse me this that was not intended. The reason for my anonymity is the fact that with such Fragenstellerei, understandably, fast after the call the Psychatrie loud becomes. Which also method hat(ist). If you should feel the Mail as annoyance, I would like to apologize hereby for it! Big is watching you? Veuillez excuser le dérangement! Moi quelque chose concernant des oreilles est venu. Une cuisine de bruit relativement inhabituelle, dont on m'a placé un Sueppchen schwerverdauliches devant, est la raison de mes Mail.Aucune expression n'est peu appétissante! Il est possible sur un Wege(in funktechnischem pour quelles réponses fréquentielles?) quelqu'un influencer ou manipuler? Ou même schikanieren et terroriser? Sous le Motto:"Einen au Sender?Nich tout à fait seulement? Petits Mannim Ohr?Falsche Wellenlaenge?Bohnen dans les oreilles? Sur la dent gefuehlt(Amalgam)?Mal non contraignant reinhoeren? Le Pullacher Wanzentanz? Le Spinnerei?Das n'est-il quand même pas du tout va, ou? Et si comme cela paraît éthiquement moralement? Au côté technique de la chose, il y a certes des rapports et des Webseiten: Totalitaer,de - Die Waffe gegen die Kritik http://www.raum-und-zeit.com/Aktuell/Brummton.htm http://www.fosar-bludorf.com/Tempelhof/ http://jya.com/haarp.htm http://www.zeitenschrift.at/magazin/zs_24_15/1_mikrowaffen.htm http://www.bse-plus.de/d/doc/lbrief/lbmincontr.htm http://home.nexgo.de/kraven/bigb/big3.html http://w3.nrl.navy.mil/projects/haarp/index.html http://cryptome.org/ http://www.raven1.net/ravindex.htm http://www.calweb.com/~welsh/ http://www.cahe.org/ http://www.parascope.com/ds/mkultra0.htm http://www.trufax.org/menu/mind.html http://www.trufax.org/menu/elect.html http://mindcontrolforum.com/ http://www.trufax.org/menu/elect.html usw. usw. usw. toutefois qui ne peut quand même pas être qui on fait soetwas, ou? Une violation des droits de l'homme séparer ressembler!?! Il est possible, par la préparation, des oreilles et dans l'effet avec la prothèse dentaire éventuellement existante? Avec la technique de radio relativement simple?? Dans ce Land?Hier et aujourd'hui Sous quels motifs? Où le département est-il en réalité 5 du BND et de la protection d'constitution? peut il être qu'il y a les personnes qui livrent en permanence le BND/Verfassungsschutz, de manière funktechnischem un rapport de situation, sans le remarquer le -même , dans l'enfance rendu possible?? Par de tels collaborateurs officieux, avec le BND et la protection d'constitution, après manière, des informations sont-elles rassemblées et plus de, purement théoriquement, chaque citoyen allemand? Il y a alors encore un droit à des Privatsphere? Qui contrôle en réalité le BND, mad et protection d'constitution sur une infiltration??? Il s'agit en réalité dans le Mail me la question de savoir si lui éléments criminels, dont le motif de l'enrichissement, ou de groupements des motifs idéologiques, possible de s'acquérir le savoir et la technique qui à d'autres temps, est autre MotivenEt place-t-il le savoir technique dont le public vraiment la fin la barre de drapeau a connaissance ? Il n'est pas donc exactement la même chose possible pour des éléments criminels, moi cela maintenant fois verharmlost et minimisant une légende, personnes ou groupes particuliers avec des moyens relativement simples, de quels motifs aussi toujours, auszuspionieren?(Westfernsehen?), a été développé. Et ce "Ausspioniererei" ne représente-t-il pas une intervention considérable dans la vie privée? Il est possible personnes ou groupes particuliers, pour certain Oeffentlichkeit(suggeriert?), celui p. ex. à l'aide des côtés Internet, comme par exemple "le Pranger"geschaffen pourrait, fois vorausgestzt schikanieren terroriesieren et ou , et qui toute (suggerierten)Oeffentlichkeit?Haben les personnes ceux là, ou d'un autre côté verunglimpft, ou on ne pas calomnie, en réalité une chance au Gegenoeffentlichkeit?Ist qui meurtre d'appel? Il y a quelques années, je ne suis pas encore par hasard sur le côté "celui" poussé, fonctionnais alors cela sous la couche de pont de l'entremise partenaire. Des personnes particulières, ou des communautés d'intérêts le peuventelles, d'un autobut pur, de tels côtés servent, sous la couche de pont d'un Zivilkourage douteux, tracent plus de des campagnes de précipitation, propres intérêts tout à fait persoehnliche entremêlent? De tels côtés peuvent-ils servir à la coordination des manoeuvres criminelles? Question, est lui possibilité ou impossibilité de manipuler ou d'influencer techniquement et socialement, particulière personnes, ou aussi groupements, criminelle/ponctuel idéologique Energei dehors, , terroriser ou schickanieren, et ce.Une manipulation de groupe cible par des masse-médias être la manipulation quotidienne qui peut extraire mansich, plus ou moins. Le droit à la vie privée est-il miné, ramment, tiefenpsychologisch, par des envois, comme, par exemple "des Big brother"? Avec un les Angemailten si un certain savoir devait exister sur le thème, je serais heureux sur des indications sur le thème.Sur la recherche des réponses à mes questions je différentes adresses maile d'Internet dessus, et espère réponses et critiques aufkonstruktive. Sur une visite du côté http://hometown.aol.de/reinerhohn38259/homepage/index.html> je me réjouirais. Si vous deviez avoir été écrit à différentes reprises par moi, je vous demande de m'excuser cela qui n'était pas envisagé. La raison de mon anonymat est le fait qu'avec telle des Fragenstellerei, l'appel devient ce qui est bien compréhensible, rapidement bruyant après le Psychatrie. Ce que la méthode a également (ist). Si vous deviez ressentir les Mail comme un ennui, je voudrais m'excuser par ceci pour cela! Big brother is watching you?

1 0

Updates to Docutils
by David Goodger June 1, 2002

June 1, 2002

In the latest round of checkins I added "header" & "footer" elements to the Docutils DTD, within an optional "decoration" element, positioned right after "docinfo". These elements are to be used for page navigation stuff, notes, time/datestamp, etc. The need for additional "decorations" may be discovered in the future. I'm not sure this is the correct approach; please speak up if you have a better idea. I've implemented the corresponding --generator, --date, --time, and --source-link options, along with their --no-* compliments. (Optik is proving very useful and easy.) Also a new transform ``docutils.transforms.universal.Decorations``, and support in the HTML writer. For those of you already using Docutils on your web sites, please consider adding the --generator/-g and --source-link/-s options when you generate HTML, to help spread the word. See the bottoms of the Docutils pages for examples. ``tools/html.py --help`` documents all implemented options. Download the latest snapshots from: - http://docutils.sf.net/docutils-snapshot.tgz - http://docutils.sf.net/docutils-sandbox-snapshot.tgz -- David Goodger <goodger(a)users.sourceforge.net> Open-source projects: - Python Docutils: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/ (includes reStructuredText: http://docutils.sf.net/rst.html) - The Go Tools Project: http://gotools.sourceforge.net/

1 0