Feb. 4, 2003
5:57 p.m.
David Goodger wrote:
But if `something`:type: is valid for any "type",
It's not. "type" has to be one of a pre-defined set of roles for which there is parser and doctree support. Each role will have an associated method or function that understands the role's semantics.
I'm confused. There seems to be parser and doctree support, since it winds up in the pseudo-XML as:: <interpreted position="prefix" role="role"> Can't the role be any string consisting of [a-zA-Z0-9_.-]+ ? --Mark