I've now put out an early version of xmlproc. There are a couple of obscure bugs and the well-formedness checking that requires parsing the internal DTD subset is not implemented yet. Other than that it is complete and I'm pretty pleased with it so far. Hopefully I'll have full well-formedness checking tomorrow and most of the validation on Monday. (I have the code for all this, but it needs redesigning.) Also: since no-one seems to have any complaints about the SAX interface, perhaps we should start building tools on top of it? Stephane, can you change your DOM package to build on SAX instead of Dan Connolly's parser? That would give the SAX interface a real test and would also mean that your package could be used with all Python parsers. (I've had a glance at your source, but will need to look more closely before I can comment on it.) And should we announce it on the xml-dev list so that the Java people there know about it? I feel a bit uneasy about this, since so far only Jack Jansen has commented on the interface and if it is to be of any use everyone needs to support it. -- "These are, as I began, cumbersome ways / to kill a man. Simpler, direct, and much more neat / is to see that he is living somewhere in the middle / of the twentieth century, and leave him there." -- Edwin Brock http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~larsga/ http://birk105.studby.uio.no/ _______________ DOC-SIG - SIG for the Python Documentation Project send messages to: doc-sig@python.org administrivia to: doc-sig-request@python.org _______________