Mailman 3 May 2021 - Docs-bugs

[issue20408] memoryview() constructor documentation error
by Berker Peksag May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Berker Peksag <berker.peksag(a)gmail.com> added the comment: New changeset 05f8ad0c745016cd8b5bdbda4336688b80f45fd7 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.10': bpo-20408: Fix memoryview() signature in docs (GH-24431) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/05f8ad0c745016cd8b5bdbda4336688b80… ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue20408> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue20408] memoryview() constructor documentation error
by Berker Peksag May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Berker Peksag <berker.peksag(a)gmail.com> added the comment: New changeset d18e5dae914b1db49b25ed7729c07a535d1f0c52 by Mariusz Felisiak in branch 'main': bpo-20408: Fix memoryview() signature in docs (GH-24431) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d18e5dae914b1db49b25ed7729c07a535d… ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue20408> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue20408] memoryview() constructor documentation error
by miss-islington May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Change by miss-islington <mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington(a)gmail.com>: ---------- pull_requests: +24948 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/26356 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue20408> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue20408] memoryview() constructor documentation error
by miss-islington May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Change by miss-islington <mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington(a)gmail.com>: ---------- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 6.0 -> 7.0 pull_requests: +24947 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/26355 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue20408> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue42392] [document removal of] the deprecated 'loop' parameter asyncio API in 3.10
by Ken Jin May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Ken Jin <kenjin4096(a)gmail.com> added the comment: > There appear to be no versionchanged:: 3.10 in the asyncio docs on the APIs that formerly accepted a loop= parameter Sorry, I missed that. Working on it. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42392> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue36384] [security] CVE-2021-29921: ipaddress Should not reject IPv4 addresses with leading zeroes as ambiguously octal
by George-Cristian Bîrzan May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

George-Cristian Bîrzan <gc(a)birzan.org> added the comment: The timeline there is wrong. This issue's creation time isn't the disclosure time, it's when the bug was introduced. The disclosure was on 30th of May, when I emailed security(a)python.org and Christian Heimes commented here and made https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25099. Even though Serhiy Storchaka commented that this could be a security issue back when the issue was new, the date would be 30th of March 2019, not 20th. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36384> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue36384] [security] CVE-2021-29921: ipaddress Should not reject IPv4 addresses with leading zeroes as ambiguously octal
by STINNER Victor May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

STINNER Victor <vstinner(a)python.org> added the comment: I created https://python-security.readthedocs.io/vuln/ipaddress-ipv4-leading-zeros.ht… to track this vulnerability. Python 3.8 is left unchanged (accept leading zeros). Python 3.7 and older are not affected. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36384> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue36384] [security] CVE-2021-29921: ipaddress Should not reject IPv4 addresses with leading zeroes as ambiguously octal
by Pablo Galindo Salgado May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablogsal(a)gmail.com> added the comment: I'm closing this, if someone thinks something is missing, please, reopen ---------- nosy: +pablogsal resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36384> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue42194] Docs for argparse.BooleanOptionalAction missing "New in version 3.9"
by John Belmonte May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Change by John Belmonte <john(a)neggie.net>: ---------- nosy: +jbelmonte nosy_count: 6.0 -> 7.0 pull_requests: +24938 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/26348 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42194> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue42194] Docs for argparse.BooleanOptionalAction missing "New in version 3.9"
by Raymond Hettinger May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger(a)gmail.com> added the comment: > How can we proceed with this doc fix? Just make a new PR. I'll check it in and close the old one. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42194> _______________________________________

1 0