Mailman 3 May 2021 - Docs-bugs

[issue41147] Document that redirect_std{out, err} yield the new stream as the context variable
by miss-islington May 26, 2021

May 26, 2021

Change by miss-islington <mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington(a)gmail.com>: ---------- pull_requests: +24972 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/26380 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41147> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue41147] Document that redirect_std{out, err} yield the new stream as the context variable
by miss-islington May 26, 2021

May 26, 2021

Change by miss-islington <mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington(a)gmail.com>: ---------- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0 pull_requests: +24971 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/26379 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41147> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue41147] Document that redirect_std{out, err} yield the new stream as the context variable
by Irit Katriel May 26, 2021

May 26, 2021

Irit Katriel <iritkatriel(a)yahoo.com> added the comment: New changeset 46db39d7bd67fb9fea133cd4f18cdf7eacb0f6d9 by Peter Law in branch 'main': bpo-41147: [doc] contextlib.redirect_stdout() provides the new stream as context var (GH-21199) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/46db39d7bd67fb9fea133cd4f18cdf7eac… ---------- nosy: +iritkatriel _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41147> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue42194] Docs for argparse.BooleanOptionalAction missing "New in version 3.9"
by John Belmonte May 26, 2021

May 26, 2021

John Belmonte <john(a)neggie.net> added the comment: I've opened a new PR, please review. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42194> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue36384] [security] CVE-2021-29921: ipaddress Should not reject IPv4 addresses with leading zeroes as ambiguously octal
by STINNER Victor May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

STINNER Victor <vstinner(a)python.org> added the comment: > I think the only thing I'd improve would be to mention that this issue is the one that introduced the bug, otherwise it looks a bit weird. Ok, done: https://python-security.readthedocs.io/vuln/ipaddress-ipv4-leading-zeros.ht… ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36384> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue36384] [security] CVE-2021-29921: ipaddress Should not reject IPv4 addresses with leading zeroes as ambiguously octal
by George-Cristian Bîrzan May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

George-Cristian Bîrzan <gc(a)birzan.org> added the comment: I think the only thing I'd improve would be to mention that this issue is the one that introduced the bug, otherwise it looks a bit weird. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36384> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue36384] [security] CVE-2021-29921: ipaddress Should not reject IPv4 addresses with leading zeroes as ambiguously octal
by STINNER Victor May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

STINNER Victor <vstinner(a)python.org> added the comment: George-Cristian Bîrzan: "The timeline there is wrong." Fixed: https://python-security.readthedocs.io/vuln/ipaddress-ipv4-leading-zeros.ht… The strange part is "2019-03-20 (-741 days): Python issue bpo-36384 reported by Joel Croteau". The problem is that this issue was "reused" for two different things: the initial change and the vulnerability. Maybe I can removed the reference to the bpo to remove it from the timeline (and put it in links). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36384> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue42392] [document removal of] the deprecated 'loop' parameter asyncio API in 3.10
by Ken Jin May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Change by Ken Jin <kenjin4096(a)gmail.com>: ---------- pull_requests: +24949 stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/26357 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42392> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue20408] memoryview() constructor documentation error
by Berker Peksag May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Change by Berker Peksag <berker.peksag(a)gmail.com>: ---------- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.11 -Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue20408> _______________________________________

1 0

[issue20408] memoryview() constructor documentation error
by Berker Peksag May 25, 2021

May 25, 2021

Berker Peksag <berker.peksag(a)gmail.com> added the comment: New changeset 8accb8c8ccf371021cba5a2b91f5b7c711fa8149 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': bpo-20408: Fix memoryview() signature in docs (GH-24431) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/8accb8c8ccf371021cba5a2b91f5b7c711… ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue20408> _______________________________________

1 0