docs January 2011

docs@python.org

25 participants
223 discussions

[issue8952] Doc/c-api/arg.rst: fix documentation of number formats

by STINNER Victor

New submission from STINNER Victor <victor.stinner(a)haypocalc.com>: The documentation of PyArg_Parse*() number formats specify that only int / float / complex are accepted, whereas any int / float / complex compatible object is accepted. "compatible" means that it has an __int__() / __float__() / __complex__() method, or nb_int / nb_float of Py_TYPE(obj)->tp_as_number->nb_int is defined (tp_as_number has no nb_complex). I suppose that the following paragraph is also outdated: "It is possible to pass "long" integers (integers whose value exceeds the platform's :const:`LONG_MAX`) however no proper range checking is done --- the most significant bits are silently truncated when the receiving field is too small to receive the value (actually, the semantics are inherited from downcasts in C --- your mileage may vary)." Moreover, "without overflow checking" should be explained (Mark told me that the number is truncated to a power of 2). ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Interpreter Core messages: 107379 nosy: docs@python, haypo, mark.dickinson priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Doc/c-api/arg.rst: fix documentation of number formats versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8952> _______________________________________

6 years

[issue10170] Relationship between turtle speed setting and actual speed is not documented

by Alexander Belopolsky

New submission from Alexander Belopolsky <belopolsky(a)users.sourceforge.net>: As Terry J. Reedy mentioned in his comment on issue 7061, turtle documentation is lacking information on how speed "codes" 0-10 translate into actual turtle speed. Attached script measures the speed of the two primitive operations that form the basis of turtle functionality at various speed settings. The results below show highly irregular pattern. The columns are: the speed code, time to draw a 200 unit line, time to complete a 360 degrees turn and the ratio of the two times. 0: 0.01 0.01 0.83 1: 1.04 2.05 0.51 2: 0.49 1.06 0.46 3: 0.30 0.72 0.42 4: 0.23 0.54 0.44 5: 0.17 0.44 0.38 6: 0.13 0.39 0.35 7: 0.08 0.32 0.26 8: 0.08 0.28 0.30 9: 0.10 0.27 0.37 10: 0.08 0.23 0.36 >From the source code, it appears that the on-screen speed is controlled by the number of animation steps while each step takes approximately time controlled by the "delay" setting that defaults to 10 milliseconds. The number of steps is determined by somewhat peculiar computations. For a rotation by angle of a degrees at speed setting s, the number of steps is n = 2 + int(a / (3 * s)) and for drawing a line of length d, n = 1 + int(d / (3 * 1.1**s * s)) I am not sure what was the reason for these choices, but I think it would be better if numeric speed code had a more direct relationship to the apparent speed. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Demos and Tools, Documentation messages: 119334 nosy: belopolsky, docs@python, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, gregorlingl, terry.reedy priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Relationship between turtle speed setting and actual speed is not documented versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10170> _______________________________________

6 years, 5 months

[issue9119] Python download page needs to mention crypto code in Windows installer

by Marc-Andre Lemburg

New submission from Marc-Andre Lemburg <mal(a)egenix.com>: This needs to be done to protect our users (importing crypto code or using it may be illegal in their home country, see http://rechten.uvt.nl/koops/cryptolaw/ for a survey) and to satisfy an attribution requirement in the OpenSSL license and code base: """ This product includes cryptographic software written by Eric Young (eay(a)cryptsoft.com). This product includes software written by Tim Hudson (tjh(a)cryptsoft.com). This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit. (http://www.openssl.org/) """ ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Build, Documentation messages: 108929 nosy: docs@python, lemburg priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Python download page needs to mention crypto code in Windows installer versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9119> _______________________________________

6 years, 8 months

[issue9913] Misc/SpecialBuilds.txt is out of date

by Alexander Belopolsky

New submission from Alexander Belopolsky <belopolsky(a)users.sourceforge.net>: It looks like Misc/SpecialBuilds.txt has not been updated since 2.4. This file is referenced from C-API documentation [1], but is not accessible as a hyperlink. Some of the recommendations in this file are out of date, in particular those that recommend setting make variables where a configure switch is available. I believe it would be best to retire Misc/SpecialBuilds.txt and move still relevant sections to proper .rst files. [1] http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/c-api/intro.html#debugging-builds ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 117076 nosy: belopolsky, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Misc/SpecialBuilds.txt is out of date versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9913> _______________________________________

6 years, 8 months

[issue9536] defaultdict doc makes incorrect reference to __missing__ method

by John Posner

New submission from John Posner <jjposner(a)optimum.net>: The documentation for collections.defaultdict is confusing with respect to the __missing__ method. The fact is that a programmer using defaultdict does not need to know anything about __missing__. The attached patch contains a rewrite of the entire section (but not the "defaultdict Examples" section, which is fine. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: defaultdict.patch keywords: patch messages: 113105 nosy: docs@python, jjposner priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: defaultdict doc makes incorrect reference to __missing__ method versions: Python 2.7 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18417/defaultdict.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9536> _______________________________________

6 years, 10 months

[issue10583] Encoding issue with chm help in 2.7.1

by flashk

New submission from flashk <flashk(a)gmail.com>: I just updated to Python 2.7.1 and noticed a small issue with the chm help file. The search results tab displays incorrect characters for various topic titles. It seems to be an encoding issue. For example, searching for 'json' yields the following results: - 18.2 json â€” JSON encoder and decoder - Whatâ€™s New in Python 2.6 I noticed this issue on Windows XP 32-bit and Windows 7 64-bit. This issue does not exist with the 2.7 chm file. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Windows messages: 122857 nosy: docs@python, flashk priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Encoding issue with chm help in 2.7.1 type: behavior versions: Python 2.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10583> _______________________________________

7 years

[issue10031] Withdraw anti-recommendation of relative imports from documentation

by Darren Dale

New submission from Darren Dale <dsdale24(a)gmail.com>: Old-style relative imports have been strongly discouraged in some sections of the python documentation. This was discussed on the python-dev mailing list. Executive summary: "The issue is implementing a PEP with nice support for relative imports, and then documenting that it should never be used." To which Guido responded: --- "Isn't this mostly historical? Until the new relative-import syntax was implemented there were various problems with relative imports. The short-term solution was to recommend not using them. The long-term solution was to implement an unambiguous syntax. Now it is time to withdraw the anti-recommendation. Of course, without going overboard -- I still find them an acquired taste; but they have their place." --- It was suggested I open a ticket and suggest specific changes. They are listed below: The faq at http://docs.python.org/py3k/faq/programming.html#what-are-the-best-practice… could go from: "Never use relative package imports. If you’re writing code that’s in the package.sub.m1 module and want to import package.sub.m2, do not just write from . import m2, even though it’s legal. Write from package.sub import m2 instead. See PEP 328 for details." to: "Although the python community generally prefers absolute imports, relative imports may be useful in certain circumstances. See PEP 328 for details." The programming faq for python-2.7 at http://docs.python.org/faq/programming.html#what-are-the-best-practices-for… could go from: "Never use relative package imports. If you’re writing code that’s in the package.sub.m1 module and want to import package.sub.m2, do not just write import m2, even though it’s legal. Write from package.sub import m2 instead. Relative imports can lead to a module being initialized twice, leading to confusing bugs. See PEP 328 for details." to: "Although the python community generally prefers absolute imports, relative imports may be useful in certain circumstances. Support for relative imports has recently been improved, and the use of the old-style relative imports is strongly discouraged. See PEP 328 for details." There is also this warning against relative imports in PEP 8, that could go from: - Relative imports for intra-package imports are highly discouraged. Always use the absolute package path for all imports. Even now that PEP 328 [7] is fully implemented in Python 2.5, its style of explicit relative imports is actively discouraged; absolute imports are more portable and usually more readable. to: - While the python community generally prefers absolute imports, relative imports may be useful in certain circumstances. Now that PEP 328 [7] is fully implemented in Python 2.5 and later, the older style of implicit relative imports is strongly discouraged. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 118031 nosy: docs@python, dsdale24 priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Withdraw anti-recommendation of relative imports from documentation versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10031> _______________________________________

7 years

[issue10702] bytes and bytearray methods are not documented

by Alexander Belopolsky

New submission from Alexander Belopolsky <belopolsky(a)users.sourceforge.net>: Library reference manual has a section dedicated to string methods [1], but similar methods of bytes and bytearray types are not documented. Adding two new sections would probably be too repetitious, so I wonder if it would make sense to add notes about byte/bytearray methods to the matching string methods' entries. See also issue10587. [1] http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/library/stdtypes.html#string-methods ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 123960 nosy: belopolsky, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: bytes and bytearray methods are not documented versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10702> _______________________________________

7 years, 1 month

[issue10503] os.getuid() documentation should be clear on what kind of uid it is referring

by Giampaolo Rodola'

New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' <g.rodola(a)gmail.com>: http://docs.python.org/library/os.html#os.getuid os.getuid() documentation just states: > Return the current process’s user id. It is not clear, however, whether "user id" refers to real, effective or saved user id. As per: http://linux.about.com/library/cmd/blcmdl2_getuid.htm ...it should refer to _real_ user id. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 122117 nosy: docs@python, giampaolo.rodola priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: os.getuid() documentation should be clear on what kind of uid it is referring versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10503> _______________________________________

7 years, 4 months

[issue9307] Py_TPFLAGS_LONG_SUBCLASS is not documented

by Alexander Belopolsky

New submission from Alexander Belopolsky <belopolsky(a)users.sourceforge.net>: Is there a reason for not documenting Py_TPFLAGS_LONG_SUBCLASS (Py_TPFLAGS_INT_SUBCLASS in 2.x)? This flag is used in PyLong_Check, but neither this flag or its inheritance properties are explained anywhere in the docs. See also issue5476. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 110787 nosy: belopolsky, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: Py_TPFLAGS_LONG_SUBCLASS is not documented type: feature request _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9307> _______________________________________

7 years, 6 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
23
Older →

Jump to page:

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

docs January 2011