Mailman 3 April 2011 - docs

[issue11260] smtpd-as-a-script feature should be documented and should use argparse
by Xavier Morel 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

New submission from Xavier Morel <xavier.morel(a)masklinn.net>: argparse has been merged to the standard library in 3.2, and (tell me if I'm wrong) would therefore be the "best-practices" way to parse command-line arguments. Numerous stdlib modules can be used as scripts, but they tend to have ad-hoc documentation (if they are at all documented) and arguments parsing (using any of the 4 available methods in Python: straight from sys.argv, getopt, optparse and argparse). I picked smtpd as a first shot since it does something useful (SMTP proxy) and has a pretty good (if ad-hoc) command-line documentation. smtpd is currently using getopt for its options parsing and the argument parsing is very cleanly factored: the port only had to replace the implementation of the `parseargs` function (and add and remove some helpers). * The port keeps the existing arguments semantics (including the mandatory host:port syntax for the local and remote specs if overridden) * The port tries to maintain the old error messages, but due to the way argparse works (or the way I used it for the specs) the parity is not perfect when providing incorrect specs * The CLI help uses argparse's formatting, and the documentation for the local and remote specs was set on these arguments rather than as an epilog. The version string was also removed from the help screen * Because they are set by argparse's arguments validation, the status codes on incorrect arguments are slightly different: - running smtpd.py as a regular user without the `--nosetuid` flag still exits with status 1 - providing incorrect spec formats (missing or non-int port) or providing too many positional arguments (3 or more) now exits with status 2 (formerly 1) ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Library (Lib) files: smtpd-to-argparse.diff keywords: patch messages: 128917 nosy: barry, docs@python, xmorel priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: smtpd-as-a-script feature should be documented and should use argparse versions: Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20812/smtpd-to-argparse.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11260> _______________________________________

8 18

[issue11253] autodocument first appearance of ctypes.wintypes constants
by anatoly techtonik 08 Nov '17

08 Nov '17

New submission from anatoly techtonik <techtonik(a)gmail.com>: I've just noticed that my application is incompatible with Python 2.5, because ctypes.wintypes is missing SHORT constants. However, I can't find the information when these symbols were introduced first. To prevent such confusion in future it would be nice to extract symbol information for each Python release and automatically include the version of the first appearance in documentation. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 128893 nosy: docs@python, techtonik priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: autodocument first appearance of ctypes.wintypes constants versions: Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11253> _______________________________________

6 7

[issue11230] "Full unicode import system" not in 3.2
by John 19 Jul '17

19 Jul '17

New submission from John <jh45dev(a)gmail.com>: A few months ago I read that in 3.2 it will be possible to import modules that are located on paths containing any unicode character. (more precisely, with chars not in the local code page) After an hour or two trying to get this to work in 3.2rc3, I went looking for clues, and found these 2 messages in which Victor Stinner says this feature is delayed until Python 3.3: http://bugs.python.org/issue3080#msg126514 http://bugs.python.org/issue10828#msg125787 Could you please make it clear in documentation and web pages, that this feature is not working yet. The Python 3.2 download page includes this: "countless fixes regarding bytes/string issues; among them full support for a bytes environment (filenames, environment variables)" and I guessed this must cover importing from any unicode path, as there was no mention that such importing had been abandoned for this version. -- jh ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 128711 nosy: docs@python, jh45 priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: "Full unicode import system" not in 3.2 versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11230> _______________________________________

7 11

[issue10438] list an example for calling static methods from WITHIN classes
by Ian 12 Jul '17

12 Jul '17

New submission from Ian <ifreecarve(a)gmail.com>: Concerning this section of the docs: http://docs.python.org/library/functions.html#staticmethod There is no example for calling a static method from another static method within the same class. As I discovered later, it's simple: C.f() -- from inside the class or outside it. A total newbie will accept this and move on... but in other programming languages, it's frowned upon to the class name from within the class. For example, in PHP you use the "self::" prefix and Java you don't need a prefix at all. So, even though I had it right the first time, it didn't SEEM right... so I went on a wild goose chase, for nothing. Googling "java call static method" will get you java documentation that lists both cases, as does "c++ call static method" and "php call static method". I feel that by adding "Note: you must also use the C.f() syntax when calling from within the class", the documentation will be more complete. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 121314 nosy: docs@python, ifreecarve priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: list an example for calling static methods from WITHIN classes type: feature request _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10438> _______________________________________

7 19

[issue11681] -b option undocumented
by Éric Araujo 13 May '17

13 May '17

New submission from Éric Araujo <merwok(a)netwok.org>: Python 2 has a -b command-line option which is undocumented. It is used by the warnings machinery to decide to warn about (-b) or raise an error (-bb) if someone uses str(bytes) or str(buffer) (explanation courtesy of grep and Python/pythonrun.c). ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation keywords: easy messages: 132195 nosy: docs@python, eric.araujo priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: -b option undocumented versions: Python 2.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11681> _______________________________________

11 22

[issue10938] Undocumented option for datetime.strftime: %s
by Humberto Diogenes 22 Feb '17

22 Feb '17

New submission from Humberto Diogenes <humberto(a)digi.com.br>: On some systems, datetime.strftime() accepts a %s format string that returns epoch / UNIX timestamp, but this behavior is not documented at http://docs.python.org/library/datetime.html Python 2.7 (r27:82508, Jul 3 2010, 21:12:11) [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5493)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import datetime >>> datetime.datetime.now().strftime('%s') '1295376929' ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 126481 nosy: docs@python, hdiogenes priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Undocumented option for datetime.strftime: %s versions: Python 2.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10938> _______________________________________

7 9

[issue11924] Pickle and copyreg modules doesn't document the interface
by Jesús Cea Avión 18 Feb '17

18 Feb '17

New submission from Jesús Cea Avión <jcea(a)jcea.es>: Python 3.2 here. "copyreg" module documentation says "See the pickle module for more details on the interface expected of function and constructor.", but I don't see any useful "copyreg" reference in pickle documentation. Some examples would be useful here, too. ---------- assignee: docs@python messages: 134416 nosy: docs@python, jcea priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Pickle and copyreg modules doesn't document the interface versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11924> _______________________________________

5 6

[issue11173] Undocumented public APIs in Python 3.2
by Marc-Andre Lemburg 14 Feb '17

14 Feb '17

New submission from Marc-Andre Lemburg <mal(a)egenix.com>: Mark Shannon on python-dev: The following API functions were removed from 3.1.3: PyAST_Compile PyCObject_AsVoidPtr PyCObject_FromVoidPtr PyCObject_FromVoidPtrAndDesc PyCObject_GetDesc PyCObject_Import PyCObject_SetVoidPtr PyCode_CheckLineNumber Py_CompileStringFlags PyEval_CallObject PyOS_ascii_atof PyOS_ascii_formatd PyOS_ascii_strtod PyThread_exit_prog PyThread__PyThread_exit_prog PyThread__PyThread_exit_thread PyUnicode_SetDefaultEncoding And the following were added to 3.2, of which only 2 are documented: PyArg_ValidateKeywordArguments PyAST_CompileEx Py_CompileString Py_CompileStringExFlags PyErr_NewExceptionWithDoc (documented) PyErr_SyntaxLocationEx PyErr_WarnFormat PyFrame_GetLineNumber PyImport_ExecCodeModuleWithPathnames PyImport_GetMagicTag PyLong_AsLongLongAndOverflow (documented) PyModule_GetFilenameObject Py_SetPath PyStructSequence_GetItem PyStructSequence_NewType PyStructSequence_SetItem PySys_AddWarnOptionUnicode PySys_AddXOption PySys_FormatStderr PySys_FormatStdout PySys_GetXOptions PyThread_acquire_lock_timed PyType_FromSpec PyUnicode_AsUnicodeCopy PyUnicode_AsWideCharString PyUnicode_EncodeFSDefault PyUnicode_FSDecoder Py_UNICODE_strcat Py_UNICODE_strncmp Py_UNICODE_strrchr PyUnicode_TransformDecimalToASCII For added confusion PySys_SetArgvEx is documented as new in 3.2, but exists in 3.1.3 Note that this only include functions. The API also includes a number of macros such as Py_False and Py_RETURN_FALSE, types , and data like PyBool_Type. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 128294 nosy: docs@python, lemburg priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Undocumented public APIs in Python 3.2 versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11173> _______________________________________

5 7

[issue11726] linecache becomes specific to Python scripts in Python 3
by STINNER Victor 09 Feb '17

09 Feb '17

New submission from STINNER Victor <victor.stinner(a)haypocalc.com>: linecache document doesn't tell that the module reads the #coding:xxx cookie to get the encoding of the Python file. linecache reads this cookie since 41665 (May 09 2007). "The linecache module allows one to get any line from any file, ..." => "any file"! And the example uses /etc/passwd which is not a Python file. Not only it reads the #coding:xxx cookie, but updatecache() tries also a PEP 302 loader to read the file. linecache should be marked as very specific to Python scripts, or it should be patched to become more generic (don't read the cookie / use loader by default). Note: the locale encoding may change between to calls to the linecache module. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Library (Lib) messages: 132641 nosy: docs@python, haypo priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: linecache becomes specific to Python scripts in Python 3 versions: Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11726> _______________________________________

8 16

[issue11670] configparser read_file now iterates over f, docs still say it calls readline
by Larry Hastings 29 Jan '17

29 Jan '17

New submission from Larry Hastings <larry(a)hastings.org>: The documentation for configparser.RawConfigParser.read_file() states: "Read and parse configuration data from the file or file-like object in f (only the readline() method is used)." This was true in Python 3.1 and before. However in 3.2 the implementation of read_file changed. It no longer calls readline(). Instead, it iterates over the file object. Whoever made this change neglected to * fix the docs, or apparently * tell anybody. I've got the commit bit, so I'd be happy to fix this. I'd like to add it to the What's New In Python 3.2 as well; there's a section about configparser changes that would be perfect. Is it permissible to change the What's New document ex post facto like this? (Adding rhettinger so he can answer this.) ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 132075 nosy: docs@python, larry, rhettinger priority: low severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: configparser read_file now iterates over f, docs still say it calls readline type: behavior versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11670> _______________________________________

5 9