Mailman 3 February 2014 - docs

[issue18269] Clarify which integer is required in os.chmod() exception
by anatoly techtonik March 6, 2020

March 6, 2020

New submission from anatoly techtonik: (<type 'int'>, '0755') (<type 'int'>, '0644') Traceback (most recent call last): File "./tools/bootstrap.py", line 185, in extract_zip os.fchmod(outfile, unixperm) TypeError: an integer is required Here the integer that is required is not `unixperm`, but `outfile`. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 191502 nosy: docs@python, techtonik priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Clarify which integer is required in os.chmod() exception versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18269> _______________________________________

3 8

[issue17231] Mark __del__ not being called in cycles as an impl detail
by Maciej Fijalkowski March 6, 2020

March 6, 2020

New submission from Maciej Fijalkowski: Here: http://docs.python.org/2/reference/datamodel.html, as per python-dev discussion ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 182364 nosy: docs@python, fijall priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Mark __del__ not being called in cycles as an impl detail type: behavior _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue17231> _______________________________________

5 5

[issue8824] Improve documentation of exec
by Terry J. Reedy Feb. 28, 2020

Feb. 28, 2020

New submission from Terry J. Reedy <tjreedy(a)udel.edu>: This doc improvement suggestion is inspired by #991196 (and subsequent duplicates) and the current discussion on py-dev in the thread 'variable name resolution in exec is incorrect' (which is not a correct claim). I believe there is consensus that the doc for exec needs improving. My suggestion (which others may amend) is that the following paragraph (from the 3.x builtin functions exec entry) "In all cases, if the optional parts are omitted, the code is executed in the current scope. If only globals is provided, it must be a dictionary, which will be used for both the global and the local variables. If globals and locals are given, they are used for the global and local variables, respectively. If provided, locals can be any mapping object." have these two sentences added: "If only globals is provided or if onedict is provided as both globals and locals, the code is executed in a new top-level scope. If different objects are given as globals and locals, the code is executed as if it were in a class statement in a new top-level scope." ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 106552 nosy: docs@python, tjreedy priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Improve documentation of exec versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8824> _______________________________________

6 19

[issue15474] Differentiate decorator and decorator factory in docs
by Éric Araujo Feb. 27, 2020

Feb. 27, 2020

New submission from Éric Araujo <merwok(a)netwok.org>: Some of the confusion encountered when writing decorators arise from the difference between a decorator (@something) and a decorator factory (@something(args)). It would help to adopt this clearer terminology in our docs: a decorator takes the decorated function as argument and does its business, a decorator factory takes some arguments and returns a decorator which wraps the decorated function. (I think it was Nick who suggested this in a recent-ish mailing list thread.) ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 166600 nosy: docs@python, eric.araujo, ncoghlan priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Differentiate decorator and decorator factory in docs versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15474> _______________________________________

8 14

[issue18837] multiprocessing.reduction is undocumented
by Tomi Pieviläinen Feb. 24, 2020

Feb. 24, 2020

New submission from Tomi Pieviläinen: In older versions (2.x, 3.2, 3.3) multiprocessing.reduction was only mentioned in a one example, with a one comment after it. In the 3.4dev documentation even this was dropped. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 196184 nosy: docs@python, tpievila priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: multiprocessing.reduction is undocumented versions: Python 3.4 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18837> _______________________________________

3 2

[issue9056] Adding additional level of bookmarks and section numbers in python pdf documents.
by pengyu.ut Feb. 19, 2020

Feb. 19, 2020

New submission from pengyu.ut <pengyu.ut(a)gmail.com>: Current pdf version of python documents don't have bookmarks for sussubsection. For example, there is no bookmark for the following section in python_2.6.5_reference.pdf. Also the bookmarks don't have section numbers in them. I suggest to include the section numbers. Could these features be added in future release of python document. 3.4.1 Basic customization ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 108334 nosy: docs@python, pengyu.ut priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Adding additional level of bookmarks and section numbers in python pdf documents. versions: Python 2.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9056> _______________________________________

7 9

[issue9305] Don't use east/west of UTC in date/time documentation
by Alexander Belopolsky Feb. 14, 2020

Feb. 14, 2020

New submission from Alexander Belopolsky <belopolsky(a)users.sourceforge.net>: I am opening this to supersede issue7229. See discussion following msg107148. In many places offsets representing the difference between local time and UTC are described as minutes or seconds east or west of UTC. This is not correct because UTC is not a place and minutes and seconds don't measure distance in this context. Replacing UTC with the Prime Meridian will not fix that because some regions in the western hemisphere use positive offsets from UTC. or example, Madrid is at 3° 42' West, but uses Central European Time which is UTC+1. I believe geographical references in the python documentation are irrelevant. What users are interested in is how to convert local time to UTC and UTC to local time rather than what is the sign of time.timezone in Madrid. I suggest the following wording for time.timezone description: time.timezone: The number of seconds one must add to the local time to arrive at UTC. Similarly, tzinfo.utcoffset() can be defined as "Returns timedelta one must add to UTC to arrive at local time." ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation keywords: easy messages: 110774 nosy: belopolsky, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: Don't use east/west of UTC in date/time documentation type: feature request versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9305> _______________________________________

15 30

[issue13826] Having a shlex example in the subprocess.Popen docs is confusing
by Julian Berman Feb. 11, 2020

Feb. 11, 2020

New submission from Julian Berman <Julian+Python.org(a)GrayVines.com>: The example at http://docs.python.org/dev/library/subprocess.html#popen-constructor seems a bit misplaced, as it seems to suggest that one should use the shlex module. Most of the other examples in the module seem to use a list to provide the args, so if there was a need to just point out that shlex could be used for a corner case perhaps it'd be better suited as a footnote or another subsection somewhere. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 151624 nosy: Julian, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Having a shlex example in the subprocess.Popen docs is confusing type: enhancement versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue13826> _______________________________________

9 14

[issue16776] Document PyCFunction_New and PyCFunction_NewEx functions
by Andrew Svetlov Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

New submission from Andrew Svetlov: c-api docs has no documentation for those public API functions. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation keywords: easy messages: 178115 nosy: asvetlov, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Document PyCFunction_New and PyCFunction_NewEx functions type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16776> _______________________________________

7 8

[issue20265] Bring Doc/using/windows up to date
by Zachary Ware Feb. 10, 2020

Feb. 10, 2020

New submission from Zachary Ware: Doc/using/windows still mentions DOS, Windows 3.x, and Python 2.1, and that's just in the first short section. This is a catch-all issue for making sure that page is up to date. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Windows keywords: easy messages: 208136 nosy: docs@python, zach.ware priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: Bring Doc/using/windows up to date type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20265> _______________________________________

11 35