docs February 2016

docs@python.org

27 participants
582 discussions

[issue22167] iglob() has misleading documentation (does indeed store names internally)

by Roy Smith

New submission from Roy Smith: For background, see: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2014-August/676291.html In a nutshell, the iglob() docs say, "Return an iterator which yields the same values as glob() without actually storing them all simultaneously." The problem is, internally, it calls os.listdir(), which apparently *does* store the entire list internally, defeating the whole purpose of iglob() I recognize that iglob() is not going to get fixed in 2.7, but at least the documentation should be updated to point out that it doesn't really do what it says it does. Or rather, it doesn't really not do what it says it doesn't :-) ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 225048 nosy: docs@python, roysmith priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: iglob() has misleading documentation (does indeed store names internally) type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22167> _______________________________________

5 months, 3 weeks

[issue23750] Clarify difference between os.system/subprocess.call in section "Replacing os.system()"

by Andreas Sommer

New submission from Andreas Sommer: Reading over the section "Replacing os.system()" (https://docs.python.org/2/library/subprocess.html#replacing-os-system), one might assume that the return value of os.system and subprocess.call are equivalent. status = os.system("mycmd" + " myarg") # becomes status = subprocess.call("mycmd" + " myarg", shell=True) However, they are not. Example: import sys import os import subprocess print subprocess.call("false") print os.system("false") gives 1 and 256, respectively. Maybe this could be rephrased for clarity, or a hint added. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 239028 nosy: Andreas Sommer, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Clarify difference between os.system/subprocess.call in section "Replacing os.system()" type: enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23750> _______________________________________

5 months, 3 weeks

[issue24475] The docs never define what a pool "task" is

by Zahari Dim

New submission from Zahari Dim: See: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30943161/multiprocessing-pool-with-maxta… The documentation never makes clear what a "task" in the context of Pool.map. At best, it says: "This method chops the iterable into a number of chunks which it submits to the process pool as separate tasks. The (approximate) size of these chunks can be specified by setting chunksize to a positive integer." in the map documentation. However it does not say how this chunks are calculated by default, making the maxtasksperchild argument not very useful. The fact that a function evaluated by map is not a "task" should be much clearer in the documentation. Also, in the examples, such as: with multiprocessing.Pool(PROCESSES) as pool: # # Tests # TASKS = [(mul, (i, 7)) for i in range(10)] + \ [(plus, (i, 8)) for i in range(10)] results = [pool.apply_async(calculate, t) for t in TASKS] imap_it = pool.imap(calculatestar, TASKS) imap_unordered_it = pool.imap_unordered(calculatestar, TASKS) TASKS are not actually "tasks" but rather "task groups". ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 245509 nosy: Zahari.Dim, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: The docs never define what a pool "task" is versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24475> _______________________________________

5 months, 3 weeks

[issue11975] Fix intersphinx-ing of built-in types (list, int, ...)

by Jonas H.

New submission from Jonas H. <jonas(a)lophus.org>: Intersphinx-ing of int, list, float, ... should work with ":class:`int`" (list, float, ...). Also, intersphinx-ing list methods, e.g. ":meth:`list.insert`", should work. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 134923 nosy: docs@python, jonash priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Fix intersphinx-ing of built-in types (list, int, ...) _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11975> _______________________________________

5 months, 3 weeks

[issue20692] Tutorial section 9.4

by Jon Shemitz

New submission from Jon Shemitz: The tutorial says "Each value is an object, and therefore has a class (also called its type). It is stored as object.__class__." So, I tried >>> 3.__class__ File "<stdin>", line 1 3.__class__ ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Yet, "foo".__class__ worked, as did 3j.__class__ and 3.5.__class__. When my son (!) suggested that I try (3).__class__, I did indeed get <type 'int'>, while (3,).__class__ gave <type 'tuple'>. This *looks like* a minor error in the parser, where seeing \d+\. puts it in a state where it expects \d+ and it can't handle \w+ This may be the sort of thing that only a newbie would even think to try, so may not be worth fixing. If so, it may be worth mentioning in the tutorial. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Interpreter Core messages: 211670 nosy: Jon.Shemitz, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Tutorial section 9.4 type: behavior versions: Python 2.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20692> _______________________________________

5 months, 3 weeks

[issue16386] imp.find_module does not specify registry key it searches on windows

by Jan Duzinkiewicz

New submission from Jan Duzinkiewicz: quote from http://docs.python.org/3/library/imp.html#imp.find_module: "...on some systems some other places are looked in as well (on Windows, it looks in the registry which may point to a specific file)." I actually didn't know the registry key is listed in "using Python on Window" guide until I grepped for PythonCore (which kind of requires to know the key already) - so I'm submitting a patch that cross references find_module docs and using Python on Windows guide. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: import_nt_reg.patch keywords: patch messages: 174508 nosy: dhgmgn, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: imp.find_module does not specify registry key it searches on windows versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27843/import_nt_reg.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16386> _______________________________________

5 months, 3 weeks

[issue11977] Document int.conjugate, .denominator, ...

by Jonas H.

New submission from Jonas H. <jonas(a)lophus.org>: Various `int` attributes and methods seem undocumented (at least it does not work to intersphinx them): * .conjugate * .denominator * .imag * .numerator * .real ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 134926 nosy: docs@python, jonash priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Document int.conjugate, .denominator, ... versions: Python 2.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11977> _______________________________________

5 months, 4 weeks

[issue21352] improve indexing

by bob gailer

New submission from bob gailer: Inconsistencies / confusion with documentation Index Tab. Example (line numbers added for comments that follow): 1 max 2 built-in function 3 max (datetime.date attribute) 4 (datetime.datetime attribute) 5 (datetime.time attribute) 6 max() built-in function 7 (decimal.Context method) 8 (decimal.Decimal method) 9 (in module audioloop) The following all lead to confusion and frustration: Having 3 rows (1, 3, 6)that begin with max. Having an entry (1) that does nothing when double-clicked. double-clicking (2) takes us to a reference rather than a definition. RECOMMENDATION: change to: max() built-in function (sequence operation) (decimal.Context method) (decimal.Decimal method) max (datetime.date attribute) (datetime.datetime attribute) (datetime.time attribute) where double-clicking the first line goes to the max() definition in 2. Built-in Functions These comments apply, with a number of variations, to most built-in functions index entries. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 217170 nosy: bgailer, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: improve indexing type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21352> _______________________________________

5 months, 4 weeks

[issue19023] ctypes docs: Unimplemented and undocumented features

by Sye van der Veen

New submission from Sye van der Veen: In the ctypes documentation, there's mention of a BigEndianUnion/LittleEndianUnion that isn't actually implemented, and the "Arrays and pointers" section just reads "Not yet written". The attached patch adds the (Big|Little)EndianUnion classes (with tests), finishes the Array/_Pointer class docs (and adds missing cases to the tests), and makes some stylistic improvements to docs. The patch was made against default, but it's quite likely it could be back-ported all the way to Python 3.1. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Tests, ctypes hgrepos: 209 messages: 197764 nosy: docs@python, syeberman priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: ctypes docs: Unimplemented and undocumented features type: enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19023> _______________________________________

6 months

[issue22128] patch: steer people away from codecs.open

by Frank van Dijk

New submission from Frank van Dijk: stackoverflow.com has a zillion answers recommending the use of codecs.open() as a unicode capable drop in replacement for open(). This probably means that there is still a lot of code being written that uses codecs.open(). That's bad thing because of codecs.open()'s lack of newline conversion. A lot of that code will - have compatibility issues when it is moved between unix and windows - silently break text files on windows, leading to issues further downstream (confusing other tools, messing up revision control histories) The problem has been fixed with io.open() in 2.x and open() in 3.x. Unfortunately the 2.7 unicode HOWTO still recommends the use of codecs.open(). The 2.7 and the 3.x documentation of codecs.open() doesn't refer the reader to better alternatives. The attached patches fix that. The only downside I see is that newly written code that uses the better alternatives would be incompatible with 2.5 and older. However croaking on a small minority of systems is better than silently disrupting workflows, causing platform incompatibilities, and inviting flaky workarounds. The 2.7 patch makes the unicode HOWTO recommend io.open() instead of codecs.open(). Both patches change the codecs.open() documentation to refer to io.open() or (on 3.x) open(). Additionally I removed the "data loss" explanation from codecs.open()'s note about its lack of newline conversion. It is not particularly helpful information and it is not entirely correct (data loss could also have been avoided by doing newline conversion before encoding and after decoding) ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: codecsopen2.patch keywords: patch messages: 224632 nosy: Frank.van.Dijk, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: patch: steer people away from codecs.open type: behavior versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36234/codecsopen2.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <report(a)bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22128> _______________________________________

6 months

Jump to page:

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

docs February 2016