3 Jul 2010 3 Jul '10
Terry J. Reedy firstname.lastname@example.org added the comment:
3.1 docs say same. For *nix, I would agree with your view of 'static', but perhaps MS uses a different terminology. Martin?
Or maybe the doc writer is using a local def of static simply as a terse, if potentially confusing, alternative to 'load-time linking'. But that could just be .lib linking versus .dll linking, which is crystal clear. Can you write an alternative paragraph or two that you think is better?
---------- nosy: +loewis, tjreedy versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2
_______________________________________ Python tracker email@example.com http://bugs.python.org/issue9086 _______________________________________