[docs] [issue9307] Py_TPFLAGS_LONG_SUBCLASS is not documented

Alexander Belopolsky added the comment: Here are other similar flags that are not documented: /* These flags are used to determine if a type is a subclass. */ #define Py_TPFLAGS_INT_SUBCLASS (1L<<23) #define Py_TPFLAGS_LONG_SUBCLASS (1L<<24) #define Py_TPFLAGS_LIST_SUBCLASS (1L<<25) #define Py_TPFLAGS_TUPLE_SUBCLASS (1L<<26) #define Py_TPFLAGS_BYTES_SUBCLASS (1L<<27) #define Py_TPFLAGS_UNICODE_SUBCLASS (1L<<28) #define Py_TPFLAGS_DICT_SUBCLASS (1L<<29) #define Py_TPFLAGS_BASE_EXC_SUBCLASS (1L<<30) #define Py_TPFLAGS_TYPE_SUBCLASS (1L<<31) On a similar note, TPFLAGS_IS_ABSTRACT is exposed in the inspect module, but is not documented in either inspect module documentation or C API documentation. I believe that as long as these flags are available from the type objects as __flags__, all valid bits should be exposed in inspect module and properly documented. ---------- components: +Library (Lib) versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker http://bugs.python.org/issue9307 _______________________________________