data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07298/0729810f9d6e3de83579355e6316307daeae3658" alt=""
Marco Buttu added the comment: Martin, I removed the class blocks by accident. In any case, I reject the patch by myself, because to me the definition of "free variable" is not clear. The documentation [1] says: "If a variable is used in a code block but not defined there, it is a free variable." According to this description, it seems to me that ``x`` is free both in ``foo()`` and in ``moo()``:
def foo(): ... print(x) ... def moo(): ... print(x) ... return moo
But actually for the code object it is not:
foo.__code__.co_freevars () moo.__code__.co_freevars ('x',)
Thank you for your feedback, I will continue the discussion in issue 26683. [1] https://docs.python.org/3/reference/executionmodel.html#naming-and-binding ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue28853> _______________________________________