
jackotonye tonyejck@gmail.com added the comment:
Might be best to make it a little more obvious since most examples are considered executable code. That would require little modification.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:20 PM SilentGhost report@bugs.python.org wrote:
SilentGhost ghost.adh@runbox.com added the comment:
imaginary in the example is not meant to refer to https://pypi.org/project/Imaginary/ it's meant to refer to a module that you could write that would do all the dirty work. Perhaps, it's not the best name to use provided there is an actual module on pypi, alternatively half-baked outdated modules could be remove.
nosy: +SilentGhost
Python tracker report@bugs.python.org https://bugs.python.org/issue38349 _______________________________________
----------
_______________________________________ Python tracker report@bugs.python.org https://bugs.python.org/issue38349 _______________________________________