Nick Coghlan added the comment: I've switched to using Vinay Sajip's "sarge" for my own subprocess invocation needs, which uses a similar all-in-one "run" API (albeit quite a different approach to capturing output). Accordingly, I don't think there's anything useful to be done specifically in the context of this issue - any energy that might be spent here would likely be spent more constructively on things like making the pipe encoding easier to configure, or reducing the risk of deadlocks due to OS-level buffer size limits. ---------- resolution: -> not a bug status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27050> _______________________________________