[docs] [issue15476] Add "code object" to glossary

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: That's fine by me. I guess what's more important to me is that "code object" have a central, linkable definition *somewhere* (and not necessarily that this somewhere be a glossary entry). That way references to code object in the docs can link to a definition in the same way that we link to definitions of other words, functions, etc. I was also planning on indexing the word more properly. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15476> _______________________________________