[docs] [issue14489] repr() function link on the built-in function documentation is incorrect

R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> added the comment: This is only a problem in the 2.7 docs. I tried adding a .. py:currentmodule:: builtins directive to the page, hoping that would make all unqualified links local, but it didn't work. I think the fix will require someone with more Sphinx-foo than I have. ---------- nosy: +r.david.murray type: -> behavior _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue14489> _______________________________________