[docs] [issue16011] "in" should be consistent with return value of __contains__

Eric Lafontaine added the comment: Hi David, sorry for the delay on my part for providing how I was getting to that conclusion. I've also resurrected an old post as I want to start contributing more seriously :). As this is documentation only (not changing the code behavior), I didn't take a look at the implementation of "in". Could you enlighten me on what else would be considered "False" in this case? Regards, Eric Lafontaine ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16011> _______________________________________