New submission from Ario Aliabadi ario.aliabadi@gmail.com:
From the multiprocessing docs: https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#contexts-and-start-me...
The child process will only inherit those resources necessary to run the process objects run() method.
Is grammatically incorrect - the run() method belongs to the process object, and so a possessive appostrophe should be employed instead:
The child process will only inherit those resources necessary to run the process object's run() method.
For more information about possessive appostrophes, see here: https://www.thepunctuationguide.com/apostrophe.html#possessives
---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 381412 nosy: arioa, docs@python priority: normal pull_requests: 22292 severity: normal status: open title: Grammatical typo in multiprocessing doc
_______________________________________ Python tracker report@bugs.python.org https://bugs.python.org/issue42407 _______________________________________
Change by Irit Katriel iritkatriel@yahoo.com:
---------- versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.8, Python 3.9
_______________________________________ Python tracker report@bugs.python.org https://bugs.python.org/issue42407 _______________________________________
Terry J. Reedy tjreedy@udel.edu added the comment:
New changeset 6edf06b24a9335a2b0d44634a95e4f5ba0d586d9 by ArioA in branch 'master': bpo-42407: Use possessive appostrophe in multiprocessing doc (GH-23400) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/6edf06b24a9335a2b0d44634a95e4f5ba0d...
---------- nosy: +terry.reedy
_______________________________________ Python tracker report@bugs.python.org https://bugs.python.org/issue42407 _______________________________________
Change by miss-islington mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington@gmail.com:
---------- keywords: +patch nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0 pull_requests: +22325 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23433
_______________________________________ Python tracker report@bugs.python.org https://bugs.python.org/issue42407 _______________________________________
Change by miss-islington mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington@gmail.com:
---------- pull_requests: +22326 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23434
_______________________________________ Python tracker report@bugs.python.org https://bugs.python.org/issue42407 _______________________________________
miss-islington mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington@gmail.com added the comment:
New changeset 0762e09eb14269b38f60e1b58d2c7f36056a4694 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.8': bpo-42407: Use possessive appostrophe in multiprocessing doc (GH-23400) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/0762e09eb14269b38f60e1b58d2c7f36056...
----------
_______________________________________ Python tracker report@bugs.python.org https://bugs.python.org/issue42407 _______________________________________
miss-islington mariatta.wijaya+miss-islington@gmail.com added the comment:
New changeset c963da269d3778b65a64ff1bd91f8772c210f305 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': bpo-42407: Use possessive appostrophe in multiprocessing doc (GH-23400) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/c963da269d3778b65a64ff1bd91f8772c21...
----------
_______________________________________ Python tracker report@bugs.python.org https://bugs.python.org/issue42407 _______________________________________
Change by Terry J. Reedy tjreedy@udel.edu:
---------- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed
_______________________________________ Python tracker report@bugs.python.org https://bugs.python.org/issue42407 _______________________________________