[issue8851] pkgutil document needs more markups
New submission from MATSUI Tetsushi <mft@users.sourceforge.net>: The library reference of pkgutil is only sparsely marked up. The attached patch is against 2.6 version, because I'm currently working with 2.6. Since a part of markups (namely :pep:'s) has already been done for 3.2 version, the patch cannot be applied directly to that version, and I haven't checked the versions in between. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: pkgutil.diff keywords: patch messages: 106708 nosy: docs@python, mft priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: pkgutil document needs more markups versions: Python 2.6 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17492/pkgutil.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8851> _______________________________________
Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment: Thanks for the report. Patch looks good to me. I assume the other function descriptions already have complete markup, since your patch touches only two of them. If there are no remarks from docs@python or objections from Georg, I will apply this in a week, taking care of all three branches. ---------- assignee: docs@python -> eric.araujo nosy: +eric.araujo versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8851> _______________________________________
Changes by Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org>: ---------- resolution: -> accepted stage: -> patch review status: open -> pending title: pkgutil document needs more markups -> pkgutil documentation needs more markup _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8851> _______________________________________
Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment: Missing markup for one ``None`` added in r87289 and following revisions for maintenance branches. ---------- resolution: accepted -> fixed stage: patch review -> committed/rejected status: pending -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8851> _______________________________________
Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment: Thanks for the report. Patch looks good to me. I assume the other function descriptions already have complete markup, since your patch touches only two of them. If there are no remarks from docs@python or objections from Georg, I will apply this in a week, taking care of all three branches. ---------- assignee: docs@python -> eric.araujo nosy: +eric.araujo versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 -Python 2.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8851> _______________________________________
Changes by Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org>: ---------- resolution: -> accepted stage: -> patch review status: open -> pending title: pkgutil document needs more markups -> pkgutil documentation needs more markup _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8851> _______________________________________
Éric Araujo <merwok@netwok.org> added the comment: Missing markup for one ``None`` added in r87289 and following revisions for maintenance branches. ---------- resolution: accepted -> fixed stage: patch review -> committed/rejected status: pending -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8851> _______________________________________
participants (2)
-
MATSUI Tetsushi -
Éric Araujo