[issue11023] pep 227 missing text
New submission from Alan Isaac <alan.isaac@gmail.com>: In PEP 227 missing text is marked with XXX. Most of this is just calls for examples and elaboration. However under the Implementation section XXX marks a substantive question about the documentation. Fixing this may be low priority, but a tracker search suggested it is currently not even being tracked ... ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 127184 nosy: aisaac, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: pep 227 missing text type: feature request _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11023> _______________________________________
R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> added the comment: Eric, what you say is technically true, but we don't have any other place to track PEP bugs. ---------- assignee: -> docs@python components: +Documentation nosy: +docs@python, r.david.murray resolution: invalid -> stage: committed/rejected -> needs patch status: closed -> open type: -> behavior _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11023> _______________________________________
Mark Lawrence added the comment: PEP 227 (Not 277 as wrongly quoted in one place) is about Statically Nested Scopes. There are several XXX place holders in the current doc. For all I know it would be possible to simply remove all of them, but who is best placed to give a definitive answer? ---------- nosy: +BreamoreBoy _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11023> _______________________________________
Cheryl Sabella <chekat2@gmail.com> added the comment: Moved to the PEP issue tracker. https://github.com/python/peps/issues/557 ---------- nosy: +csabella resolution: -> later stage: needs patch -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue11023> _______________________________________
participants (4)
-
Alan Isaac -
Cheryl Sabella
-
Mark Lawrence
-
R. David Murray