Change by spaceman_spiff <accounts@sgerber.de>: ---------- type: -> enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36532> _______________________________________

Change by Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake@gmail.com>: ---------- nosy: +fdrake _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36532> _______________________________________

Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip@yahoo.co.uk> added the comment: But there is an example in the cookbook already: https://docs.python.org/3/howto/logging-cookbook.html#use-of-alternative-for... It's right there in the first code sample in that section. You might want to amend your change to point to this section from the one where you want to make the change. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36532> _______________________________________

spaceman_spiff <accounts@sgerber.de> added the comment: I was under the impression that this was all it takes to use loggers with the normal string.format syntax. e.g.: log.info('{}', 'Test') Turns out when I tested it I used f-strings in the first parameters - so I got it wrong. Imho this can be closed and the pr rejected. Sorry for wasting your time :) ---------- stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36532> _______________________________________