data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b18ed/b18ed347dac76beeeb885efec853785f6e83a4ac" alt=""
this section, 3.1.2. Strings, contains the following phrase: This only works with two literals though perhaps it was meant to read This only works with *true* literals though [bolded only for this email] I noticed this in version 3.9.2. ...mark horowitz
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d10b/8d10b204d052c765fb4cd15ec85d75af41044f78" alt=""
Hi and thanks for reporting, Le 6/2/21 à 7:58 PM, mark horowitz a écrit :
I think both are right: - It only works when the "two operands" (to the "invisible operator") are literals. - It only works when they really are literals. I still prefer the former, because there's no such thing as "false iterals". Can we think of another unambiguous formulation? Maybe "This only works with literals though"? Bests, -- [Julien Palard](https://mdk.fr)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b18ed/b18ed347dac76beeeb885efec853785f6e83a4ac" alt=""
Ah, bonjour, Julien. Perhaps one the following... But this concatenation without an explicit operator works only if each operand is a literal. Or But this works only if each string is a literal, though, not a variable or expression. ...mark On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 5:14 AM Julien Palard <julien@palard.fr> wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e9fb/4e9fb695dc30c35131dc94550826398b1673292f" alt=""
Bonjour, Le 6/4/21 à 12:42 PM, mark horowitz a écrit :
This would work for me, would you mind opening a pull request? The sentence is in this file: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Doc/tutorial/introduction.rst Bonne journée, -- [mdk](https://mdk.fr)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d10b/8d10b204d052c765fb4cd15ec85d75af41044f78" alt=""
Hi and thanks for reporting, Le 6/2/21 à 7:58 PM, mark horowitz a écrit :
I think both are right: - It only works when the "two operands" (to the "invisible operator") are literals. - It only works when they really are literals. I still prefer the former, because there's no such thing as "false iterals". Can we think of another unambiguous formulation? Maybe "This only works with literals though"? Bests, -- [Julien Palard](https://mdk.fr)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b18ed/b18ed347dac76beeeb885efec853785f6e83a4ac" alt=""
Ah, bonjour, Julien. Perhaps one the following... But this concatenation without an explicit operator works only if each operand is a literal. Or But this works only if each string is a literal, though, not a variable or expression. ...mark On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 5:14 AM Julien Palard <julien@palard.fr> wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e9fb/4e9fb695dc30c35131dc94550826398b1673292f" alt=""
Bonjour, Le 6/4/21 à 12:42 PM, mark horowitz a écrit :
This would work for me, would you mind opening a pull request? The sentence is in this file: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Doc/tutorial/introduction.rst Bonne journée, -- [mdk](https://mdk.fr)
participants (3)
-
Julien Palard
-
Julien Palard
-
mark horowitz