Report bugs on the leaps year
Dear Sir/Madam, [cid:image002.png@01D4AA81.1B676110] I accidentally found out that for years 1700, 1800, and 1900, they should be leaps year but then it shows that it has 28 days on February. Best Regards, Sheou Shuang. Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 9:00 AM #CHUAH SHEOU SHUANG# <SCHUAH003@e.ntu.edu.sg> wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
I accidentally found out that for years 1700, 1800, and 1900, they should be leaps year but then it shows that it has 28 days on February.
Sorry, but Python has it right here. In the Gregorian calendar, years that are divisible by 100 but not divisible by 400 are not leap years. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_year#Gregorian_calendar for more information. Regards, -- Zach
Thank you so much for the information 😊 Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ From: Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pydocs@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2019 1:59:03 AM To: docs@python.org Cc: #CHUAH SHEOU SHUANG# Subject: Re: [docs] Report bugs on the leaps year On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 9:00 AM #CHUAH SHEOU SHUANG# <SCHUAH003@e.ntu.edu.sg> wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
I accidentally found out that for years 1700, 1800, and 1900, they should be leaps year but then it shows that it has 28 days on February.
Sorry, but Python has it right here. In the Gregorian calendar, years that are divisible by 100 but not divisible by 400 are not leap years. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_year#Gregorian_calendar for more information. Regards, -- Zach
participants (2)
-
#CHUAH SHEOU SHUANG# -
Zachary Ware