[issue25813] co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date
New submission from Mark Lawrence: It states "bitmap: 1=optimized | 2=newlocals | 4=*arg | 8=**arg" which is identical to the 2.7 docs. Hence it bears no resemblance to the latest code.h, which for example has #define CO_ITERABLE_COROUTINE 0x0100. ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 255985 nosy: BreamoreBoy, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: co_flags section of inspect module docs out of date versions: Python 3.5, Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Mark Lawrence added the comment: None of these constants are documented either:- inspect.CO_COROUTINE inspect.CO_GENERATOR inspect.CO_ITERABLE_COROUTINE inspect.CO_NESTED inspect.CO_NEWLOCALS inspect.CO_NOFREE inspect.CO_OPTIMIZED inspect.CO_VARARGS inspect.CO_VARKEYWORDS ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Anybody? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Clearly nobody is interested so closing. ---------- status: open -> closed versions: -Python 3.5 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Changes by Berker Peksag <berker.peksag@gmail.com>: ---------- stage: -> needs patch status: closed -> open type: -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.5 _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Mark Lawrence added the comment: I am the OP, this stays closed. If you couldn't be bothered to reply before please raise a new issue. ---------- status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
R. David Murray added the comment: I think Yuri might be interested. ---------- assignee: docs@python -> yselivanov nosy: +r.david.murray, yselivanov stage: needs patch -> status: closed -> open type: enhancement -> _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
R. David Murray added the comment: Mark, please don't close the issue. You raised a valid point, it got overlooked, but like I said I think Yuri will be interested in looking at it. This is a volunteer operation. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Mark Lawrence added the comment: For the final time, *I* am the OP and not one of you could be bothered before so this remains closed. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Changes by Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>: ---------- status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
R. David Murray added the comment: I'll leave it closed, but I don't think that is best for the community. ---------- assignee: yselivanov -> _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Changes by Yury Selivanov <yselivanov@gmail.com>: ---------- superseder: -> document CO_* constants _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Georg Brandl added the comment:
For the final time, *I* am the OP and not one of you could be bothered before so this remains closed.
Are you quite all right? Continuing behavior of that sort will get your tracker account disabled. ---------- nosy: +georg.brandl status: closed -> open _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Mark Lawrence added the comment: It's all ready been superceeded, or haven't you woken up to that fact either? ---------- status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
Georg Brandl added the comment:
It's all ready been superceeded, or haven't you woken up to that fact either?
Excuse me for not having all issues in my head. (And that #26010 states that it's a followup to #26010 doesn't help.) In the future, please accept that the core developers are who decide about issues being closed or not. Submitters are only given privilege to close their own issues because it lightens the load on coredevs if issues become obsolete (and no, no answer in less than 30 days does not mean obsolete). As I already said, abusing that privilege will eventually get you banned - so much the sooner with your past history taken into account. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25813> _______________________________________
participants (5)
-
Berker Peksag -
Georg Brandl
-
Mark Lawrence
-
R. David Murray
-
Yury Selivanov