[issue11233] clarifying Availability: Unix
New submission from Sandro Tosi
R. David Murray
Antoine Pitrou
I like the footnote idea.
Me too.
I wonder if it would also be worth marking which functions are Posix (Availability: posix) and therefore likely to be available on all unix systems.
POSIX has optional APIs, hasn't it?
----------
nosy: +pitrou
_______________________________________
Python tracker
R. David Murray
Georg Brandl
R. David Murray
Georg Brandl
Changes by Ezio Melotti
Roundup Robot
Changes by Sandro Tosi
R. David Murray
Éric Araujo
Georg Brandl added the comment:
A draft is attached. The directive currently just always links to the "availability" notes, which I have moved to the main "Operating system services" document. Please review!
----------
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32065/availability-directive.patch
_______________________________________
Python tracker
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
I can't comment on the Sphinx extension code but this is a good idea.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker
Changes by Berker Peksag
STINNER Victor added the comment:
I like the idea of a single place where the Availability is described, and adding a link to this place. availability-directive.patch LGTM.
----------
nosy: +haypo
_______________________________________
Python tracker
Cheryl Sabella
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
Change by Cheryl Sabella
Cheryl Sabella
Change by Cheryl Sabella
STINNER Victor
Change by Cheryl Sabella
STINNER Victor
STINNER Victor
Cheryl Sabella
participants (11)
-
Antoine Pitrou
-
Berker Peksag
-
Cheryl Sabella
-
Ezio Melotti
-
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
-
Georg Brandl
-
R. David Murray
-
Roundup Robot
-
Sandro Tosi
-
STINNER Victor
-
Éric Araujo