Mailman 3 [issue10681] PySlice_GetIndices() signature changed - docs - python.org

newer
[issue9370] Add reader redirect...

[issue10681] PySlice_GetIndices() signature changed

older
[issue10793] hashlib.hash.digest()...

Phil Thompson

11 Dec 2010 11 Dec '10

6:12 p.m.

New submission from Phil Thompson : In Python v3.2b1 the type of the first argument of PySlice_GetIndices() and PySlice_GetIndicesEx() has changed from PySliceObject* to PyObject*. The documentation does not reflect this change. Which is correct, the source code or the documentation? ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Interpreter Core messages: 123809 nosy: Phil.Thompson, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: PySlice_GetIndices() signature changed type: behavior versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker http://bugs.python.org/issue10681 _______________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Show replies by date

Martin v. Löwis

11 Dec 11 Dec

6:17 p.m.

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: The source is correct. Fixed in r87171. ---------- nosy: +loewis resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker http://bugs.python.org/issue10681 _______________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Phil Thompson

7:10 p.m.

Phil Thompson added the comment: You might want to add a "Changed in Python v3.2" because as it is an incompatible change. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker http://bugs.python.org/issue10681 _______________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Martin v. Löwis

7:23 p.m.

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: It's not an incompatible change, but I added the versionchanged anyway in r87173. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker http://bugs.python.org/issue10681 _______________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Phil Thompson

12 Dec 12 Dec

1:38 a.m.

Phil Thompson added the comment: It's source level incompatible - my extension modules compiled fine with v3.2a but failed with v3.2b1. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker http://bugs.python.org/issue10681 _______________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Martin v. Löwis

7:35 a.m.

Martin v. Löwis added the comment:

It's source level incompatible - my extension modules compiled fine with v3.2a but failed with v3.2b1.

That's because you are using C++, right? In C, there shouldn't be any problems. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker http://bugs.python.org/issue10681 _______________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

Dave Malcolm

30 Dec 30 Dec

5:40 p.m.

Dave Malcolm added the comment: For reference, this seems to affect SWIG, specifically, I'm seeing build failures using: /usr/share/swig/2.0.1/python/pycontainer.swg from swig-2.0.1 See downstream build failure report for znc, which uses swig to generate python 3 bindings: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666429 ---------- nosy: +dmalcolm _______________________________________ Python tracker http://bugs.python.org/issue10681 _______________________________________

Reply

Sign in to reply online Use email software

4865

Age (days ago)

4884

Last active (days ago)

Download

6 comments

3 participants

tags

participants (3)

Dave Malcolm
Martin v. Löwis
Phil Thompson