Confusing documentation at cpython-test-docs.readthedocs.io
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1660/a1660e096eeef139c64fd7f4b9d9fa0f40c482fb" alt=""
Hi there, While Googling for "python 2 enum" (to see if Enums are available in Python 2), I found this strange result at the top: [image: Screen Shot 2022-06-03 at 4.10.50 PM.png] The link goes to https://cpython-test-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/library/enum.html. This seems like a pretty outdated (test?) version of the docs, given that the homepage is versioned at Python 2.7.6. However, the contents seem to be documentation for Python 3, which is a little confusing. Is there some way this could be updated or entirely removed? Best, Justin
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef9a3/ef9a3cb1fb9fd7a4920ec3c178eaddbb9c521a58" alt=""
Hi, Official information about Python is at python.org. If you look at another site, make sure you have some reason to trust that site. Anyone can put outdated, unmaintained or even misleading/malicious information on the Internet, and being the top result in Google doesn't make something a good source of information. In this case, it appears to be Ammar's personal project, perhaps a proof of concept for an idea. Ammar, is this test still useful? On 04. 06. 22 1:12, Justin Su wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1460/b1460cd7be7db3714bef076aff13a3aedb304f78" alt=""
Thanks for the ping Petr. I honestly have no idea what I was testing with this, looks like it's half a decade old. Didn't realize Google would end up indexing it and showing it so prominently, I've gone ahead and deleted the project. Cheers, Ammar On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 7:03 AM Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com> wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef9a3/ef9a3cb1fb9fd7a4920ec3c178eaddbb9c521a58" alt=""
Hi, Official information about Python is at python.org. If you look at another site, make sure you have some reason to trust that site. Anyone can put outdated, unmaintained or even misleading/malicious information on the Internet, and being the top result in Google doesn't make something a good source of information. In this case, it appears to be Ammar's personal project, perhaps a proof of concept for an idea. Ammar, is this test still useful? On 04. 06. 22 1:12, Justin Su wrote:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1460/b1460cd7be7db3714bef076aff13a3aedb304f78" alt=""
Thanks for the ping Petr. I honestly have no idea what I was testing with this, looks like it's half a decade old. Didn't realize Google would end up indexing it and showing it so prominently, I've gone ahead and deleted the project. Cheers, Ammar On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 7:03 AM Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com> wrote:
participants (3)
-
Ammar Askar
-
Justin Su
-
Petr Viktorin