data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d066a/d066a29dcd4899ca7717dffbbf4f7d4d3e86ffb4" alt=""
You can see it if you really want to using print(): the above needs to be: You can see it if you really want to use print(): You can see it if you really want by using print():
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d10b/8d10b204d052c765fb4cd15ec85d75af41044f78" alt=""
Hi, On Saturday, May 7th, 2022 at 15:14, khudadat baluch <khudadatbaluch@gmail.com> wrote:
For some context it's: Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst-value is called ``None`` (it's a built-in name). Writing the value ``None`` is Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst-normally suppressed by the interpreter if it would be the only value written. Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst:You can see it if you really want to using :func:`print`:: Maybe it misses comas, like:
You can see it, if you really want to, using :func:`print`::
(but I'm not a native english writer so I'm not sure it's even better...). -- Julien Palard https://mdk.fr
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/071df/071df8ec57379eec72bab6f8c127ab7e52d3b1b6" alt=""
As a native speaker of USS mid-western English, it strikes me as fine (maybe a bit informal, but natural) the way it's written. The first option suggested strikes me as correct, but for me a bit unnatural, and the second option is fine, but a bit more formal. I don't know that much would be gained by the change. On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 10:22 AM Julien Palard via docs <docs@python.org> wrote:
-- Naomi Ceder @NaomiCeder • https://www.naomiceder.tech https://www.manning.com/books/the-quick-python-book-third-edition
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d10b/8d10b204d052c765fb4cd15ec85d75af41044f78" alt=""
Hi, On Saturday, May 7th, 2022 at 15:14, khudadat baluch <khudadatbaluch@gmail.com> wrote:
For some context it's: Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst-value is called ``None`` (it's a built-in name). Writing the value ``None`` is Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst-normally suppressed by the interpreter if it would be the only value written. Doc/tutorial/controlflow.rst:You can see it if you really want to using :func:`print`:: Maybe it misses comas, like:
You can see it, if you really want to, using :func:`print`::
(but I'm not a native english writer so I'm not sure it's even better...). -- Julien Palard https://mdk.fr
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/071df/071df8ec57379eec72bab6f8c127ab7e52d3b1b6" alt=""
As a native speaker of USS mid-western English, it strikes me as fine (maybe a bit informal, but natural) the way it's written. The first option suggested strikes me as correct, but for me a bit unnatural, and the second option is fine, but a bit more formal. I don't know that much would be gained by the change. On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 10:22 AM Julien Palard via docs <docs@python.org> wrote:
-- Naomi Ceder @NaomiCeder • https://www.naomiceder.tech https://www.manning.com/books/the-quick-python-book-third-edition
participants (3)
-
Julien Palard
-
khudadat baluch
-
Naomi Ceder