[issue32306] Clarify map API in concurrent.futures
Dec. 20, 2017
11:36 a.m.
Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment: I see. So the problem you are pointing out is that the tasks *arguments* are consumed eagerly. I agree that may be a problem in some cases, though I think in most cases people are concerned with the *results*. (note that multiprocessing.Pool() has an imap() method which does what you would like) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32306> _______________________________________
3127
Age (days ago)
3127
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Antoine Pitrou