Re: [docs] Improve -O docs (issue 17232)
Does this link to the place where __debug__ is documented (assuming
https://bugs.python.org/review/17232/diff/7583/Doc/using/cmdline.rst File Doc/using/cmdline.rst (right): https://bugs.python.org/review/17232/diff/7583/Doc/using/cmdline.rst#newcode... Doc/using/cmdline.rst:214: :const:`__debug__`. Change the filename extension for compiled On 2013/03/14 08:47:00, ezio.melotti wrote: there is
such place)?
https://docs.python.org/3/library/constants.html#__debug__ https://bugs.python.org/review/17232/diff/7583/Doc/using/cmdline.rst#newcode... Doc/using/cmdline.rst:221: Discard docstrings in addition to what :option:`-O` does. On 2013/03/14 08:47:00, ezio.melotti wrote:
What about "Like :option:`-O`, but also discard docstrins."?
At the time I wrote this, -00 *is* -0 + discard docstrings. I see the point of mentioning things in this order. Perhaps Do :option:`-O` and also discard docstrings. https://bugs.python.org/review/17232/diff/7583/Modules/main.c File Modules/main.c (right): https://bugs.python.org/review/17232/diff/7583/Modules/main.c#newcode69 Modules/main.c:69: -O : remove assert and __debug__-dependent statements; change .py\n\ On 2013/03/14 08:47:00, ezio.melotti wrote:
Shouldn't this be .pyc?
Yes https://bugs.python.org/review/17232/diff/7583/Modules/main.c#newcode71 Modules/main.c:71: -OO : remove doc-strings in addition to the -O changes\n\ On 2013/03/14 08:47:00, ezio.melotti wrote:
I would re-use the same wording I proposed for the docs.
I suggested a slightly different replacement. -OO : do -O and also discard docstrings\n\ https://bugs.python.org/review/17232/
participants (1)
-
tjreedy@udel.edu