New submission from Giampaolo Rodola':
In Python 2 the distinction between open() and codes.open() was clear because 'encoding' and 'errors' args were provided by codecs.open only. This is no longer the case in Python 3 since both args are provided also by open().
I'm probably missing something but regardless I think codecs.open doc  should be more clear as to when and why (say) codecs.open(file, encoding='utf8', errors='ignore') should be preferred over open(file, encoding='utf8', errors='ignore').
---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 184303 nosy: docs@python, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Difference between open and codecs.open versions: Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4
STINNER Victor added the comment:
See also the PEP 400. I proposed (in the alternative) to make codecs.open() somehow an alias to open() (and add codecs.open_stream() for "backward compatibility").
---------- nosy: +haypo
Change by Irit Katriel firstname.lastname@example.org:
---------- versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.8, Python 3.9 -Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4