[issue32074] Might be a wrong implementation
New submission from Sai Bhargava Ramu <saiediitm@gmail.com>: https://docs.python.org/2/library/itertools.html#itertools.combinations #The behaviour of combinations function in documentation is different and I think identation is missing with `else` #I didn't get the logic right is point out anything further. This might not be a real issue ---------- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: combinations.py messages: 306499 nosy: Sai Bhargava Ramu, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Might be a wrong implementation type: behavior versions: Python 3.5 Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file47273/combinations.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32074> _______________________________________
Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpython@gmail.com> added the comment: The implementation in the documentation is correct. Did you tested your implementation? The indentation of the "else" is correct. See https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#the-for-statement ---------- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32074> _______________________________________
participants (2)
-
Sai Bhargava Ramu
-
Serhiy Storchaka