On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:11 PM Nicholas H.Tollervey <ntoll@ntoll.org> wrote:
On 03/07/18 16:04, Andre Roberge wrote:
>
> ​ I do agree with what you write ... but, at the same time, I've been
> struggling to define appropriate categories. Some software can be
> designed for use by (young) adult beginners but not for young children.
> (For example: anything that will rely heavily on word menus ... say,
> like Microsoft Word.) I'm using the term hobbyists for this category.
> Other software can be designed to be used by young children.  I did not
> see Mu being designed to be used in a CS 101 type of course.  Perhaps I
> am wrong and should simply think of the target audience as "everyone"
> like I did for IDLE.... ?

Got it in one! :-)

Mu is for *anyone* who is a beginner programmer, no matter their age or
background.

Mu is a *very small* code base (currently around 3.5kloc). However, the
installers for Windows and OSX weigh in at around 100mb. Why? Because Mu
bundles Python 3, Qt, Tkinter, Matplotlib, Numpy, Jupyter, PyGame,
PyGameZero and a host of other things commonly used by those starting
computing classes.

Why include all this stuff? Because (and I remember this from my
university days) just being able to set up a dev environment on your own
computer is a royal pain in the arse -- especially if you're a newbie.
;-) If the answer is "just install Mu, 'cos it's easy" then beginner
data scientists immediately have a "first steps" IDE they can use to
skill-up before they go figure out how to "pip install jupyter" and
point their browser to the right place. ;-)

Does this make sense?

​Yes, it does.  I did install Mu just a few days ago to have a look and this is one thing that struck me as being extremely positive, as it solves so many problems faced by beginners. I am truly, truly impressed by it.

I cringe when I see people on the learnpython subreddit reply to people that are clearly absolute beginners that they should use PyCharm.​  (I do not bother replying anymore as the PyCharm fans crowd wrongly believe that their choice is the only suitable one).

My only question about suitability for CS 101 type of audience is that will it be perceived (by those "serious" CS students) more as a toy, given its friendly interface, than a "professional" tool suitable for them - such as Wing 101, or PyCharm Edu.     (Don't take me wrong: I really think it would be very suitable - I'm just wondering about the students' impression.)

André

N.