On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:48 AM, kirby urner <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:kirby.urner@gmail.com" target="_blank">kirby.urner@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><br>
    I&#39;d be interested in hearing from anyone with experience in teaching
    Processing to this age group, and anyone with any thoughts on the
    topic.<br>
    <br>
    Thanks,<br>
    Andy Judkis<br>
    Academy of Allied Health and Science<br>
    Neptune, NJ<br>
  </div>

<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>I probably shouldn&#39;t be answering this as I don&#39;t have the Processing experience, though would gladly attend a work shop at one of those &quot;cultural literacy for STEM teachers&quot; events in the planning.</div>

<div><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>When I wrote the above, I was all wound up from writing this essay, kinda long, so just a link, but a good overview of my outlook, oft re-stated.<br><br><a href="http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=7896983">http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=7896983</a><br>
<br>I would expect these views to be unpopular on math-thinking-l, another list I&#39;ve haunted, as it&#39;s so colored by the &quot;object oriented outlook&quot; (OOO or O3).  :-)<br><br>Kirby<br><br></div></div>