Re: [Edu-sig] [ANN] rur-ple: pre-release of new lessons.
I routinely rope in commercial products for their educational value, including but not limited to computer games and simulations. It's important for our family that we have access to toyz. I actively stimulate the imaginations of toy makes with descriptions of what we'd likely buy, and charge on our Platinum Amazon Visa, which I just signed for while buying Tara a new robot dog with her own money (the 16+% variable APR is
promotional discount, which turned out not to apply, as this was a pass
From: kirby urner [mailto:kirby.urner@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 2:06 PM pretty outrageous -- thinking mainly of the through from Toys R Us, and therefore apparently >not qualified). Good American ;) Forgive me my relentlessly adversarial stance. But I was a misunderstood child, you see. My father was the poor boy, who was able to provide me with some advantages. Like nice toys. Would drive him crazy that I wouldn't "take better care of them". The evidence was certainly there - the toy in pieces. But the toys actually sucked - and the only interest I had in them was taking them apart, to see how they worked, and for scrap parts to build some whozeewhatsit (that never quite worked). The spirit isn't dead. Last month instead of showing up to the extended family holiday party with gifts, I offered to take the kids shopping the following morning. A cousin is a glassblower living a pretty Spartan/ low tech existence out in the country. His youngest insisted he wanted to shop at a hardware store - where he went through the isles picking out odd pieces of this and that - whozeewhatsit components, quite enviously. Not an electronic component among them. PyGeo is, I guess, by current whozeewhatsit. The fact that it happens to rely on some electronic underpinning being mostly happenstance. Art
On 1/29/06, Arthur <ajsiegel@optonline.net> wrote:
From: kirby urner [mailto:kirby.urner@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 2:06 PM
Forgive me my relentlessly adversarial stance. But I was a misunderstood child, you see. My father was the poor boy, who was able to provide me with some advantages. Like nice toys. Would drive him crazy that I wouldn't "take better care of them". The evidence was certainly there - the toy in pieces.
Good autobio. I can also see why this might predispose you to appreciate the open source approach, where the guts are within reach, and if you don't like how your Tivo is programmed or whatever, you can just hack on it. That's the spirit behind O'Reilly's Make: magazine for sure -- seems you would have loved a subscription, might even today. Other products come sealed up tight with a lot of warnings, and trying to get to the guts voids the waranty or whatever. Some might rather reverse engineer, and damage the goods beyond repair anyway, because the working version isn't as valuable as the non-working version with the guts exposed (to them). You get into tense family dynamics when you have say a brother with a little sister, and the boy likes to take apart sister's favorite gizmos, to say "what makes them tick" (but he of course lacks the skills to put humpty dumpty together again). Obviously, parental intervention is in order. Or maybe it's the girl who's training to become an astronaut, and who keeps making off with the brother's boy toys to do secret projects with them. One day, her hide-out is discovered... (many story-lines diverge). Kirby
participants (2)
-
Arthur -
kirby urner