Fwd: The 'Certified' Teacher Myth (long)
I'm forwarding this, enqueued with Math Forum moderators, as it gives some background perspective of potential utility to edu-sig subscribers, plus indirectly expresses my gratitude to Stef Mientki for his promising project. If you're embroiled in USA "math wars" at all and want to do background reading on this thread, here's a link: http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1869138&tstart=0 I'd recommend staying blissfully ignorant of a lot of it though, lest you get caught up in dinosaur flavors of "should we allow calculators in math class?" kinds of debates (nothing at all about computer languages), angry mud slinging that's been going on for decades and going nowhere (lots of energy sinks, time sucks, not worth your attention). You may wonder why I bother to comment then, on Michael's mud-slinging (appended). As I mentioned in a follow-up: """ I'll fix and upload to edu-sig, in case Math Forum management decides not to archive publicly -- should go somewhere, world-readable, given my marketing angle -- Grunch isn't Michael's to spin, at least not all by himself. I have my investments to protect. """ For those with no idea what "Grunch" means (esoteric!), here's another Math Forum thread you might find edifying in this regard: http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1866451&tstart=0 If you heard my talk at Chicago Pycon last year, or watched it on YouTube or ShowMeDo, you know that I talk about Fuller a lot -- a part of my (Quaker brand) futurism. Kirby ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: kirby urner <kirby.urner@gmail.com> Date: Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:06 AM Subject: Re: The 'Certified' Teacher Myth To: Michael Paul Goldenberg Cc: math-teach@mathforum.org, Richard Tchen, Haim, Wayne Bishop I haven't been following math-teach closely of late, don't think spitting in anyone's face, Haim's included (a mask), is going to solve the problems of Grunch being semi in control of world affairs, Grunch being Fuller's psychological projection (into American literature) of the phenomenon of wholesale globalization. If you're at all curious about my focus these days, aside from K-mods in the enneacontahedron (per geometry-pre-college, a different Math Forum list), I'm getting input from my peers re my upcoming 'Python for Teachers' in Chicago next spring. In particular, I've been looking for ways to integrate the VPython window, for spatial geometry, vectors and so on, with the shell and editing environments. Just yesterday, I learned of a breakthrough in this regard thanks to Google's Summer of Code program, a way of bringing strong coders into positions better able to benefit a larger population. Here's a screen shot of overlapping windows with VPython's one of them (spatial geometry lesson): http://www.flickr.com/photos/17157315@N00/3105638687/sizes/o/ Here's a screen shot of a new project-based IDE (integrated development environment) with VPython just one more display panel, surrounded by editing surfaces (modeling a hospital ER): http://www.flickr.com/photos/17157315@N00/3105561953/sizes/o/ I've already informed my edu-sig friends (a list in Python Nation), of my intent to showcase the latter as a part of my discussion, even if only in slide format. Certified teachers from the Chicago area are invited to this workshop, but mostly we're pandering to private sector geeks, thinking once they get out of high school, they'll go directly into corporate training programs, a lot of 'em, bypassing college until later maybe. Many will start in these programs even before finishing high school, as a bridge to some future position. Tuitions are really high right now, out of step with the ambient culture, especially in light of how far behind the times your average PhD has become (in just about any field you care to mention). Silicon Forest needs people, can't afford to sponsor these pipelines that no longer work for us. So as you can see, the whole thing about "certification" is kind of a side issue. In the private sector, we have our own way of designing a meritocracy, aren't looking to teacher unions for direction, not our culture. Kirby Urner grunch.net On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Michael Paul Goldenberg wrote: << SNIP >>
As we prepare for what well may another world-wide depression thanks to the GRUNCH of the giants that Haim doesn't want to discuss here (we're supposed to believe that it's teachers' unions that got us where we are, I suppose), we should be spitting in the faces of people like Haim and their self-serving, utterly bankrupt views and policies.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:27 AM, kirby urner <kirby.urner@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm forwarding this, enqueued with Math Forum moderators, as it gives some background perspective of potential utility to edu-sig subscribers, plus indirectly expresses my gratitude to Stef Mientki for his promising project.
If you're embroiled in USA "math wars" at all and want to do background reading on this thread, here's a link: http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?threadID=1869138&tstart=0
I'd recommend staying blissfully ignorant of a lot of it though,
+1
lest you get caught up in dinosaur flavors of "should we allow calculators in math class?" kinds of debates (nothing at all about computer languages), angry mud slinging that's been going on for decades and going nowhere (lots of energy sinks, time sucks, not worth your attention).
Now that we are embarked on creating interactive textbooks for the OLPC XO project, (_not_ CAI-style, but more along the lines described in Seymour Papert's book Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas), all of those arguments are irrelevant.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Michael Paul Goldenberg wrote:
<< SNIP >>
As we prepare for what well may another world-wide depression thanks to the GRUNCH of the giants that Haim doesn't want to discuss here (we're supposed to believe that it's teachers' unions that got us where we are, I suppose), we should be spitting in the faces of people like Haim and their self-serving, utterly bankrupt views and policies.
Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
Plenty of people can be blamed for the current mess in education worldwide. I have a better idea. Let's invent something that they can't prevent infiltrating the system. Wait, we've done that. Well then, let's get on with it. "Living well is the best revenge."--George Herbert "Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration."--Thomas Edison, who was evidently an optimist. Really good ideas can take the rest of your life to work out, or in the truly exceptional cases, the lives of multitudes for centuries, even millennia to come. -- Silent Thunder (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) is my name And Children are my nation. The Cosmos is my dwelling place, The Truth my destination. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Mokurai
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Edward Cherlin <echerlin@gmail.com> wrote: << SNIP >>
lest you get caught up in dinosaur flavors of "should we allow calculators in math class?" kinds of debates (nothing at all about computer languages), angry mud slinging that's been going on for decades and going nowhere (lots of energy sinks, time sucks, not worth your attention).
Now that we are embarked on creating interactive textbooks for the OLPC XO project, (_not_ CAI-style, but more along the lines described in Seymour Papert's book Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas), all of those arguments are irrelevant.
Irrelevant in our circles certainly, but for many, the "calculator wars" have become a way of life, a cottage industry. Given MIT pushed for that "computers in the jungle" aesthetic (a marketing gimmick, not saying ineffective), there're still very few USAers who even know what an XO is. As geeks, we forget that (I have one under my tree, for symbolic value): http://worldgame.blogspot.com/2008/12/snow.html When I took mine to Fine Grind (csn.fg) recently, none of the very bright people there had ever seen one (has nothing to do with IQ): http://worldgame.blogspot.com/2008/11/posting-from-my-xo.html How do we get the word to ordinary USAers about "life after calculators"? I suggest more hype around Sugar as North Americans love sugar and corn above all (corn syrup = the breakfast god). Sugar is something of a Python flagship as well, looks like an iPod (circular menus). Why nothing on the backs of cereal boxes then? Not ready for prime time? My suggestion is been more of those overseas schools, where overseas might mean in Colorado, a 50-50 mix of native and imported students, wanting diversity of experience, training to become diplomats maybe, and sharing these new toyz. Growing up as an expat much of the time, I know the State Department is well aware of this model and could implement it pronto as an alternative public school network, branded as such (not just for "rich kids"). Here's a quick sketch of a blueprint, some details bleeped: http://mybizmo.blogspot.com/2008/08/new-kind-of-charter.html Minus well-packaged curriculum segments, self schoolers tend to reinvent too many wheels. We think it's cute if they hit on an algorithm for addition or multiplication (lots of constructivist cooing) but always practicing for "after the nuclear winter" or whatever isn't really moving us back from the brink. We force kids into idiocy at gunpoint almost (lots of threats if you start to act smart in some peer groups -- especially if you're a teacher with a big dummy textbook you're expected to teach to (a kind of bullying)). In my view, it's a matter of withholding heritage, with most schools functioning as giant shut-off valves, their primary purpose being to deny access. On the bright side though, kids go home to the Internet and YouTube, and those motivated to catch up, do so, morph into geeks, and join us on the front lines, where we know what "XO" means. Kirby End notes:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Michael Paul Goldenberg wrote:
(I'm not a fan of MPG's writings -- too vitriolic, yet devoid of substance)
<< SNIP >>
Not my view of GRUNCH, nor am I expecting "depression":
As we prepare for what well may another world-wide depression thanks to the GRUNCH of the giants that Haim doesn't want to discuss here (we're supposed to believe that it's teachers' unions that got us where we are, I suppose), we should be spitting in the faces of people like Haim and their self-serving, utterly bankrupt views and policies.
Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
participants (2)
-
Edward Cherlin -
kirby urner