RE: RE: [Edu-sig] RE: Integration correction
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b52011045c2c77d09101e5fe29a14f4f.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
-----Original Message----- From: Lloyd Hugh Allen [mailto:chandrakirti@gmail.com] To: Arthur Subject: Re: RE: [Edu-sig] RE: Integration correction
I thought that there already were little black box libraries all over the place. Just that most of them were in C etc.
Yes, but... There was a bottom. The bottom has dropped out. Is the best I can express it. Art
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b52011045c2c77d09101e5fe29a14f4f.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
From: Arthur [mailto:ajsiegel@optonline.net]
From: Lloyd Hugh Allen [mailto:chandrakirti@gmail.com] To: Arthur Subject: Re: RE: [Edu-sig] RE: Integration correction
I thought that there already were little black box libraries all over the place. Just that most of them were in C etc.
Yes, but...
There was a bottom. The bottom has dropped out.
Is the best I can express it.
And I did say for *better* and for worse, and do recognize this is largely an issue of sensibility, in respect to change. And there are competing interests in the community, not all of which can be consistently and equally satisfied. Probably decorators will in the end give Python more industrial strength. It happens that was never my interest in Python. So I consider myself a loser here. But I see no reason not to try to be a good enough sport about it. And - believe it or not - this is about the best I can do. Art
participants (1)
-
Arthur