In any case, we've gone by the "everything for everyone" approach for 5
years now. I'm saying, let's try the other route and see if it works
better. If yes, we'll stick to it, if no, we'll come back to the current
approach. No gain without experiment.

I'm strident about this because apart from the talk quality, everything
is good at the conference. This is the only thing I've heard big
complaints about and this, in my opinion, is the way to fix it.

I'm not intransingent about this and am perfectly amenable to being
argued out of it. I'd just like discussion. I think there must be
atleast a few people who agree with my point of view.