Can we have talks upvote or downvote open to only those who have registered for the conf ?
This will reduce the fake votes I believe .As I attended one of the talks on Day 2 who got a lot of up-votes but I don't know what shit he was talking.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Noufal Ibrahim KV <noufal@nibrahim.net.in> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07 2014, SUMIT KUMAR RAJ wrote:

> I was the second time attendee of Pycon. First time I attended in 2012
> and second 2014.  I am also disappointed with the quality of workshops
> and some talks being given. With my watch I can say 2012 workshops in
> Christ were better than 2014 workshops.  Talks on Day 2 were better
> than Day 1 this year...this was the feedback of some of my friends as
> well who attended Pycon this year.  I agree with Noufal than just for
> the sake of pulling crowd we should not compromise with the quality.
> I would tell you honest feedback of mine. Paying 1000 bucks for one
> workshop and then you come to know that's not worth peanuts .
> Definitely we should concentrate on quality speakers whether be it for
> intermediates or experts .

[...]

Workshops are more complicated since it's an attempt to actually teach
rather than to just present an idea.

I don't have any concrete thoughts on them. My original thread was
focussed on the quality of talks rather than on the workshops.


--
Cordially,
Noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
_______________________________________________
Inpycon mailing list
Inpycon@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon



--
Regards...
----------------------
Sumit Kumar Raj
Software Engineer,
Yodlee Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
Bangalore,India