On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Noufal Ibrahim <noufal@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Anand Chitipothu <anandology@gmail.com> wrote: [..]
I think we should first form a team of reviewers.
Agreed. The more the merrier. I had mailed a couple of the core devs about this and they can offer *some* time. We need a good team here as well. I can pitch in. The more people there are, the easier it will be for all of us.
Who else is willing?
+1. I had volunteered for this right from the start and this is something I am looking forward to. We need to draft a CFP document and publish it in the mailing list as well as email it out to a list of interested presenters. We could use the email addresses collected from last year for this. I will create a very basic CFP draft and send it to you the week-end. We can thrash it out in the mailing list and develop it over the next week. It would be useful to have an idea of the specific tracks (if any) so that the CFP is not very vague.
-- ~noufal http://nibrahim.net.in _______________________________________________ Inpycon mailing list Inpycon@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/inpycon
-- --Anand