On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@au-kbc.org> wrote: [..]
you have not got the point I am making. The point is that we have to decide the following:
1. are proposals public or not Nope. They get mailed/uploaded, a committee reviews them and it's over. The junta doesn't have a say in picking/commenting on proposals.
2. who reviews them The committee which we're trying to set up. Anand Pillai is one of the members and more are welcome.
3. who makes the final decision We'll appoint someone to *head* it. Anand has already started work on the CFP so if he's willing to own this up, it'd be perfect.
4. is there to be interaction with the author before a final decision is taken Case by case basis although I see no reason why not to do this.
-- ~noufal http://nibrahim.net.in