Hello, looking at spamproc.py line 90: def test_mail(mail, spamc=False, cmd=False): """Test a email with spamassassin.""" score = "0/0\n" orig_code = None spamassassin_result = None returncode = None if cmd: satest = cmd elif spamc: # let spamc process mails larger than 500 KB if ISBG forwards them satest = ["spamc", "-E", "--max-size=268435450"] else: satest = ["spamassassin", "--exit-code"] proc = utils.popen(satest) The limit 268435450 seems to be hardcoded. But 268.435.450 bytes is 268.435kBytes is 268MBytes... So. Why is my 5MB Mail not scanned? Anyway, should satest = ["spamc", "-E", "--max-size=268435450"] not be something like satest = ["spamc", "-E", "--max-size="+sa.maxsize] (note the object sa is not available here I think). Now, for some reason, I now do not get the error ['spamc', '-E', '--max-size=268435450'] error for mail 151 anymore, but instead: ['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 151 NoneType: None I have in between deleted the .cache/isbg/track* files Regards, Hendrik

On 19-12-02 14 h 02, Hendrik Friedel wrote:

Hello,

I still have this problem, unfortunately. After some weeks of usage isbg.py has found only one spam message. All spam that was not found was probably not found due to this problem, as I did a re-run over my complete mailbox with the spamassassin-threshold set to 2.5. It did not find any more spam, but a lot of 342 is too big (spamc return code 98) 327 is too big (spamc return code 98) 316 is too big (spamc return code 98) 296 is too big (spamc return code 98) 285 is too big (spamc return code 98) 127 is too big (spamc return code 98) 100 is too big (spamc return code 98) 86 is too big (spamc return code 98) ['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 603 NoneType: None ['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 593 NoneType: None ['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 588 NoneType: None ['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 584 NoneType: None ['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 575 NoneType: None ['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 570 NoneType: None ['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 560 NoneType: None ['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 555 NoneType: None ['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 547

What can I do?

Regards, Hendrik

------ Originalnachricht ------ Von: "Hendrik Friedel" An: isbg@python.org Gesendet: 24.11.2019 11:43:34 Betreff: [Isbg] Re: messages too large; --maxsize without effect

...

Hello,

looking at spamproc.py line 90: def test_mail(mail, spamc=False, cmd=False):     """Test a email with spamassassin."""     score = "0/0\n"     orig_code = None     spamassassin_result = None     returncode = None

    if cmd:         satest = cmd     elif spamc:         # let spamc process mails larger than 500 KB if ISBG forwards them         satest = ["spamc", "-E", "--max-size=268435450"]     else:         satest = ["spamassassin", "--exit-code"]

    proc = utils.popen(satest)

The limit 268435450 seems to be hardcoded. But 268.435.450 bytes is 268.435kBytes is 268MBytes... So. Why is my 5MB Mail not scanned?

Anyway, should satest = ["spamc", "-E", "--max-size=268435450"]

not be something like satest = ["spamc", "-E", "--max-size="+sa.maxsize] (note the object sa is not available here I think).

Now, for some reason, I now do not get the error ['spamc', '-E', '--max-size=268435450'] error for mail 151

anymore, but instead:

['spamassassin', '--exit-code'] error for mail 151 NoneType: None

I have in between deleted the .cache/isbg/track* files

Regards, Hendrik

_______________________________________________ Isbg mailing list -- isbg@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to isbg-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/isbg.python.org/

Hi, The best way to report bugs, is to use the Issue Tracker (https://gitlab.com/isbg/isbg/issues) as it helps us triage bugs more effectively. For the time being, I've opened one for you here: https://gitlab.com/isbg/isbg/issues/143 Although it's slower, I would suggest you use spamd instead of spamc until that bug is fixed. I'll try to have a look at it as soon as possible, but with the Holidays looming in I don't have tons of free time :( -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄

Nice Post! A very informative post and lots of really honest. https://bit.ly/3cZdJTv

This is a great inspiring article.I am pretty much pleased with your good work. https://bit.ly/3GSCduC

I had to fix the python script by changing the configuration for my website https://allpokemoncardslist.blogspot.com but its working fine now.