Dear Joseph,
Thanks a lot for clarification.
Best,
Mariya

On 28 April 2015 at 14:55, Joseph Weston wrote:
Hi,

I'd like to add to Christoph's answer

```Thanks for feedback, but I am still confused.
Let me make an example:
there are two leads 0 and 1, the lead 0 is filled more than lead 1;
from the leads 0 there is an outgoing mode exp(i k x), which is normalized
by flux in the leads;
the wave function inside of the scattering region is
psi = t exp (i k x) + r exp (-i k x)

What does the program give if the wave function is called with lead number 0?
psi? (and when the leads have couple of modes, then psi[i] are sorted is
some comfortable for the program way)
or  r exp (-i k x)?
```

Calling the wavefunction with lead number 0 would give you `psi`, the
*full scattering state*, in your example.
As to the ordering, the kwant documentation says (http://bit.ly/1EziBYZ):
The modes appear in the same order as incoming modes in kwant.physics.modes
Hopefully this clarifies things.

In your previous email you asked about calculating the electronic density in a transport
setup and gave an example. From what I can see your example is correct in the case
that there are no true bound states in the system. Any bound states will contribute
to the density and are not calculated by kwant.wave_function
(but they should not contribute to the DC transport).

In the second example you ask about the equivalence between calculating
a current in the leads using scattering matrices and current in the central part
of the system by using the scattering wavefunctions. You are, of course, correct
in your statement that the two should give the same result (at least in your
example of a bar attached to 2 leads). From an initial glance at your code, it seems
that there are at least 2 problems with your wavefunction calculation:

1) You add together the wavefunctions corresponding to different modes, and then
calculate the current given by this coherent superposition. What you should actually
do is calculate the current due to *each* of the wavefunctions and then add these
currents.
2) When you calculate the current you only do so between sites (1, 1) and (2, 1),
despite the fact that your system is 6 sites wide. To get the total current flowing
through the bar you should, of course,  calculate the current between sites
(1, i) -> (2, i) for i in (0, 6] and add them all together.

Best,

Joe